The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school
Abstract
Abstract “Ways of taking” from books are a part of culture and as such are more varied than current dichotomies between oral and literate traditions and relational and analytic cognitive styles would suggest. Patterns of language use related to books are studied in three literate communities in the Southeastern United States, focusing on such “literacy events” as bedtime story reading. One community, Maintown, represents mainstream, middle-class school-oriented culture; Roadville is a white mill community of Appalachian origin; the third, Trackton, is a black mill community of recent rural origin. The three communities differ strikingly in their patterns of language use and in the paths of language socialization of their children. Trackton and Roadville are as different from each other as either is from Maintown, and the differences in preschoolers' language use are reflected in three different patterns of adjustment to school. This comparative study shows the inadequacy of the prevalent dichotomy between oral and literate traditions, and points also to the inadequacy of unilinear models of child language development and dichotomies between types of cognitive styles. Study of the development of language use in relation to written materials in home and community requires a broad framework of sociocultural analysis. (Crosscultural analysis, ethnography of communication, language development, literacy, narratives.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom
Mehan, H. (1979) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 · Cited by 2,872
Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking
(1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611810 · Cited by 1,774
Directions in sociolinguistics
John, J. G. (2017) · Cited by 1,649
Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy
Dillon, G. L., & Tannen, D. (1984) · Language · doi:10.2307/413655 · Cited by 1,306
Questions and politeness : strategies in social interaction
Goody, E. N. (1978) · Philosophy and Rhetoric · Cited by 1,297
The achievement and antecedents of labelling
Ninio, A., & Bruner, J. (1978) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000900001896 · Cited by 1,016
Psychological Significance of Styles of Conceptualization
Kagan, J., Moss, H. A., & Sigel, I. E. (1963) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1165673 · Cited by 370
Language Learning Strategies: Does the Whole Equal the Sum of the Parts?
Peters, A. M. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413177 · Cited by 340
Conceptual Styles, Culture Conflict, and Nonverbal Tests of Intelligence
COHEN, R. A. (1969) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1969.71.5.02a00040 · Cited by 221
The Functions and Uses of Literacy
Heath, S. B. (1980) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01778.x · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Cited by
Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 · Cited by 4,263
To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021890 · Cited by 1,299
Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power
Briggs, C. L., & Bauman, R. (1992) · Journal of Linguistic Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 · Cited by 1,167
Added value of dialogic parent–child book readings: A meta-analysis
Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., de Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H. (2008) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409280701838603 · Cited by 973
Fivush, R., Haden, C. A., & Reese, E. (2006) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00960.x · Cited by 951
Metadata
- Authors
- Heath, S. B.
- Venue
- Language in Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1982-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-76
- ISSN
- 0047-4045 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8013
- OpenAlex
- W1968105961
- Cited by
- 1,532
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 19.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0047404500009039
- The paper
- Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500009039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.