The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Characterization of Obsidian and its application to the Mediterranean Region
Abstract
Evidence of contact between cultural groups is of great importance to the study of prehistory. Although the development of absolute dating methods has decreased our dependence on the discovery of such contacts for chronology, they are essential material when the origin and spread of culture is being studied. In the past, cultural contacts have generally been demonstrated by typological similarities of artifacts, but unfortunately many typological comparisons are open to discussion, and it can be exceedingly difficult to be certain of direct contact by this means alone. The importance in this respect of the study of raw materials used in places far from their place of origin and presumably deliberately imported has long been realized. Recently more attention has been paid to the careful characterization of such materials; the detection, that is, of properties of the specimen under study which are characteristic of material from particular sources. By this means it is often possible to assign a source to a given specimen. The petrological identification of British neolithic stone axes is perhaps the most comprehensive archaeological characterization study yet undertaken. Demonstrations of trading links made by such methods, if based on a sure identification and a comprehensive survey of possible sources, are not open to the criticism and doubt which may be directed at typological similarities. The variety of techniques now available for the analysis and identification of materials makes this field a promising one for the archaeologist.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1970) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521070515 · Cited by 396
Stress and warfare among the Kayenta Anasazi of the thirteenth century A.D
Haas, J., Creamer, W., Kvamme, K. L., Green, M., Lucius, W. A., & History., F. M. O. N. (1993) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.3530 · Cited by 74
Holocene Obsidian Exchange in the Red Sea Region
Khalidi, L. (2010) · Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2719-1_19 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Cann, J. R., & Renfrew, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1964-12
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 111-133
- ISSN
- 0079-497X (ISSN-L)
- 2050-2729
- OpenAlex
- W2127617108
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Characterization of Obsidian and its application to the Mediterranean Region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0079497x00015097
- The paper
- Cann, J. R., & Renfrew, C. (1964). The Characterization of Obsidian and its application to the Mediterranean Region. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0079497x00015097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.