The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virginia Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions: An Application of Tobit Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Using data from a survey of farm operators in two Virginia counties, the authors analyze farmers' soil conservation decisions. Results indicate that financial factors, including income and debt, are the most important influences on the sample farmers' use of conservation practices. Additional factors such as perception of erosion, education level, off-farm employment, and tenancy also influence conservation expenditures. Factors influencing conservation tillage acreage differ from those influencing expenditures for other conservation practices. In particular, age and race of the operator and on-farm erosion potential are significantly related to the use of conservation tillage but not other practices. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for conservation programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
Cited by
The adoption of agricultural innovations
Feder, G., & Umali, D. L. (1993) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(93)90053-a · Cited by 963
Abid, M., Scheffran, J., Schneider, U. A., & Ashfaq, M. (2015) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-6-225-2015 · Cited by 554
Shiferaw, B. (1998) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-5150(98)00036-x · Cited by 507
Gould, B. W., Saupe, W. E., & Klemme, R. M. (1989) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146791 · Cited by 360
Adaptation to climate change in Uganda: Evidence from micro level data
Hisali, E., Birungi, P., & Buyinza, F. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.005 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Norris, P. E., & Batie, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-90
- ISSN
- 0081-3052 (ISSN-L)
- 1074-0708
- 2056-7405
- OpenAlex
- W1595151882
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virginia Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions: An Application of Tobit Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0081305200017404
- The paper
- Norris, P. E., & Batie, S. S. (1987). Virginia Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions: An Application of Tobit Analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0081305200017404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
