The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clams and brachiopods—ships that pass in the night
Abstract
The presumed geometry of clam and brachiopod clades (brachiopod declines matched closely by clam increases) has long served as primary data for the classic case of gradual replacement by competition in geological time. Agassiz invoked the geometric argument to assert the general superiority of clams, and it remains the standard textbook illustration today. Yet, like so many classic stories, it is not true. The supposed replacement of brachiopods by clams is not gradual and sequential. It is a product of one event: the Permian extinction (which affected brachiopods profoundly and clams relatively little). When Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic times are plotted separately, numbers of clam and brachiopod genera are positively correlated in each phase. Each group pursues its characteristic and different history in each phase—clams increasing, brachiopods holding their own. The Permian extinction simply reset the initial diversities. The two groups seem to track each other in each phase and a plot of brachiopod vs. clam residuals (each from their own within-phase regressions against time) yields significantly positive association. Some of this tracking may be an artifact of available rock volumes; we could, however, detect no effect of stage lengths. Passive extrapolation of microevolutionary theory into the vastness of geological time has often led paleontologists astray. Competitive interaction may rule in local populations, but differential response to mass extinctions (surely not a matter of conventional competition) may set the relative histories of large groups through geological time. Similarly, adaptive superiority in design cannot, in the usual sense of optimal engineering, have much to do with the macroevolutionary success of clams. The interesting question lies one step further back: what in the inherited Bauplan of a clam permits flexibility in design and why are other groups, however successful in their own domain, unable to alter their basic design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Escalation of Plant Defense: Do Latex and Resin Canals Spur Plant Diversification?
Farrell, B. D., Dussourd, D. E., & Mitter, C. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285258 · Cited by 401
The origin and early radiation of dinosaurs
Brusatte, S. L., Nesbitt, S. J., Irmis, R. B., Butler, R. J., Benton, M. J., & Norell, M. A. (2010) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.04.001 · Cited by 305
BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND MACROEVOLUTION: EXTENSIONS AND MISMATCHES ACROSS SCALES AND LEVELS
Jablonski, D. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00317.x · Cited by 294
Key evolutionary innovations and their ecological mechanisms
Heard, S. B., & Hauser, D. L. (1995) · Historical Biology · doi:10.1080/10292389509380518 · Cited by 280
Diversity-dependence, ecological speciation, and the role of competition in macroevolution
Rabosky, D. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135800 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, S. J., & Calloway, C. B.
- Venue
- Paleobiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383-396
- ISSN
- 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2414049311
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clams and brachiopods—ships that pass in the night. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0094837300003572
- The paper
- Gould, S. J., & Calloway, C. B. (1980). Clams and brachiopods—ships that pass in the night. Paleobiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300003572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.