The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trophic diversity in past and present guilds of large predatory mammals
Abstract
Trophic diversity within guilds of terrestrial predators is explored in three modern and two ancient communities. The modern communities span a range of environments including savannah, rainforest, and temperate forest. The paleocommunities are North American, Orellan (31–29 Ma), and late Hemphillian (7–6 Ma), respectively. The predator guilds are compared in terms of: 1) species richness; 2) the array of feeding types; and 3) the extent of morphological divergence among sympatric species. Feeding type is determined from dental measurements that reflect the proportion of meat, bone, and non-vertebrate foods in the diet. Measurements include estimates of canine shape, tooth size, cutting blade length, and grinding molar area. Morphological divergence among sympatric predators is measured by calculating Euclidean distances among species in a six-dimensional morphospace. Results indicate that the number of predator and prey species are roughly correlated in both ancient and modern communities. Two of the predator guilds, the late Hemphillian and modern Yellowstone, contain relatively few species and appear to be the result of extinction without replacement. Despite differences in history, age, and environment, the extent of morphological divergence within guilds does not differ significantly for the sampled communities. It is clear that the basic pattern of adaptive diversity in dental morphology among coexisting carnivores was established at least 32 million years ago. It appears that interspecific competition for food has acted similarly to produce adaptive divergence among sympatric predators in communities that differ widely in time, space, and taxonomic composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaslow, C. R. (1987) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z87-011 · Cited by 15
Cited by
Functional versus morphological diversity in macroevolution
Wainwright, P. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095706 · Cited by 373
The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids
(2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515562.001.0001 · Cited by 321
Deja vu: the evolution of feeding morphologies in the Carnivora
Van Valkenburgh, B. (2007) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icm016 · Cited by 320
Self-citationVan Valkenburgh, B. (1991) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300010691 · Cited by 313
Sampson, S. D., & Witmer, L. M. (2007) · Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology · doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[32:caomct]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Valkenburgh, B.
- Venue
- Paleobiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-173
- ISSN
- 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2339168525
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trophic diversity in past and present guilds of large predatory mammals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0094837300011891
- The paper
- Van Valkenburgh, B. (1988). Trophic diversity in past and present guilds of large predatory mammals. Paleobiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300011891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.