The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alpha, beta, or gamma: where does all the diversity go?
Abstract
Global taxonomic richness is affected by variation in three components: within-community, or alpha, diversity; between-community, or beta, diversity; and between-region, or gamma, diversity. A data set consisting of 505 faunal lists distributed among 40 stratigraphic intervals and six environmental zones was used to investigate how variation in alpha and beta diversity influenced global diversity through the Paleozoic, and especially during the Ordovician radiations. As first shown by Bambach (1977), alpha diversity increased by 50 to 70 percent in offshore marine environments during the Ordovician and then remained essentially constant for the remainder of the Paleozoic. The increase is insufficient, however, to account for the 300 percent rise observed in global generic diversity. It is shown that beta diversity among level, soft-bottom communities also increased significantly during the early Paleozoic. This change is related to enhanced habitat selection, and presumably increased overall specialization, among diversifying taxa during the Ordovician radiations. Combined with alpha diversity, the measured change in beta diversity still accounts for only about half of the increase in global diversity. Other sources of increase are probably not related to variation in gamma diversity but rather to appearance and/or expansion of organic reefs, hardground communities, bryozoan thickets, and crinoid gardens during the Ordovician.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patterns of taxonomic and ecological structure of the shelf benthos during Phanerozoic time
Valentine, J. W. (1969) · Palaeontological Association · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16226412 · Cited by 251
Global tectonics and the fossil record
Valentine, J. W., & Moores, E. M. (1972) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/627723 · Cited by 184
Cited by
The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): The palaeoecological dimension
Servais, T., Owen, A. W., Harper, D. A. T., Kröger, B., & Munnecke, A. (2010) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.05.031 · Cited by 342
The Ordovician biodiversification: setting an agenda for marine life
Harper, D. A. T. (2006) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.010 · Cited by 261
The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): definition, concept and duration
Servais, T., & Harper, D. A. T. (2018) · Lethaia · doi:10.1111/let.12259 · Cited by 246
Do all mass extinctions represent an ecological crisis? Evidence from the Late Ordovician
Brenchley, P. J., Marshall, J. D., & Underwood, C. J. (2001) · Geological Journal · doi:10.1002/gj.880 · Cited by 123
Jablonski, D. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution · doi:10.1002/jez.b.21075 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Sepkoski, J. J.
- Venue
- Paleobiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-234
- ISSN
- 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2162239729
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alpha, beta, or gamma: where does all the diversity go? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0094837300011969
- The paper
- Sepkoski, J. J. (1988). Alpha, beta, or gamma: where does all the diversity go? Paleobiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300011969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.