The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rarefaction analysis of morphological and taxonomic diversity
Abstract
Our assessment of morphological diversity is influenced by morphological extremes and therefore depends on sample size (taxonomic richness). Rarefaction predicts the morphological diversity that would probably be observed in a sample of reduced size, thereby allowing both compensation for differences in sample size that may be strictly preservational, and analysis of diversity structure, that is, the relationship between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Middle and Late Cambrian trilobites exhibit a diversity structure characterized by many variations on a few morphological themes. In contrast, Middle and Late Ordovician trilobites occupy a larger range of morphospace per unit of species richness. Diversity structure in the Devonian is similar to that in the Middle and Late Ordovician, but the magnitude of morphological diversity is lower in the Devonian, as many fewer species are observed. For blastoids, different aspects of morphological diversity (range of morphospace occupied, number of character states possessed, and number of different regions in morphospace occupied) exhibit different relationships to taxonomic richness. In all cases Permian blastoids are characterized by a diversity structure in which morphological diversity per unit of taxonomic richness is greater than for Devonian blastoids. Changes in morphological diversity in fissiculate blastoids appear to reflect evolution of continuous variation in thecal morphology more than changes in the number of character states. Saunders and Swan's data on Namurian ammonoids illustrate some significant differences in diversity structure among stratigraphic levels, but many apparent differences in morphological diversity are consistent with the possibility that they reflect the sampling of different numbers of species from the same underlying diversity structure. Rarefaction curves are also presented for idealized increases and decreases in diversity, and these are compared to some of the observed changes in trilobites, blastoids, and ammonoids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution
Gould, S. J. (1988) · Journal of Paleontology · doi:10.1017/s0022336000059126 · Cited by 310
Patterns of taxonomic and ecological structure of the shelf benthos during Phanerozoic time
Valentine, J. W. (1969) · Palaeontological Association · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16226412 · Cited by 251
Cited by
DISPARITY: MORPHOLOGICAL PATTERN AND DEVELOPMENTAL CONTEXT
ERWIN, D. H. (2007) · Palaeontology · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00614.x · Cited by 363
Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods
Wills, M. A., Briggs, D. E. G., & Fortey, R. A. (1994) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s009483730001263x · Cited by 349
Clades reach highest morphological disparity early in their evolution
Hughes, M., Gerber, S., & Wills, M. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1302642110 · Cited by 262
Calibrating the Ordovician Radiation of marine life: implications for Phanerozoic diversity trends
Miller, A. I., & Foote, M. (1996) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300016237 · Cited by 240
Self-citationDeng, Y., Fan, J., Zhang, S., Fang, X., Chen, Z., Shi, Y., Wang, H., Wang, X., Yang, J., Hou, X., et al. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103743 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Foote, M.
- Venue
- Paleobiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2268566600
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rarefaction analysis of morphological and taxonomic diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0094837300012185
- The paper
- Foote, M. (1992). Rarefaction analysis of morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300012185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.