The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variation in dinosaur skeletochronology indicators: implications for age assessment and physiology
Abstract
Twelve different bones from the skeleton of the holotype specimen of the hadrosaurian dinosaur Hypacrosaurus stebingeri were thin-sectioned to evaluate the significance of lines of arrested growth (LAGs) in age assessments. The presence of an external fundamental system (EFS) at the external surface of the cortex and mature epiphyses indicate that the Hypacrosaurus specimen had reached adulthood and growth had slowed considerably from earlier stages. The number of LAGs varied from none in the pedal phalanx to as many as eight in the tibia and femur. Most elements had experienced considerable Haversian reconstruction that had most likely obliterated many LAGs. The tibia was found to have experienced the least amount of reconstruction, but was still not optimal for skeletochronology because the LAGs were difficult to count near the periosteal surface. Additionally, the numbers of LAGs within the EFS vary considerably around the circumference of a single element and among elements. Counting LAGs from a single bone to assess skeletochronology appears to be unreliable, particularly when a fundamental system exists. Because LAGs are plesiomorphic for tetrapods, and because they are present in over a dozen orders of mammals, they have no particular physiological meaning that can be generalized to particular amniote groups without independent physiological evidence. Descriptions of dinosaur physiology as “intermediate” between the physiology of living reptiles and that of living birds and mammals may or may not be valid, but cannot be based reliably on the presence of LAGs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing dinosaur growth patterns: a microscopic revolution
Erickson, G. M. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.012 · Cited by 257
Growth in small dinosaurs and pterosaurs: The evolution of archosaurian growth strategies.
Padian, K., Horner, J. R., & De Ricqlès, A. (2004) · Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology · doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2004)024[0555:gisdap]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 214
Self-citationCastanet, J., Curry Rogers, K., Cubo, J., & Jacques-Boisard, J. (2000) · Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie · doi:10.1016/s0764-4469(00)00181-5 · Cited by 207
Paleohistological estimation of bone growth rate in extinct archosaurs
Cubo, J., Le Roy, N., Martinez-Maza, C., & Montes, L. (2012) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1666/08093.1 · Cited by 123
Osteohistology of Confuciusornis sanctus(Theropoda: Aves)
De Ricqlès, A. J., Padian, K., Horner, J. R., Lamm, E.-T., & Myhrvold, N. (2003) · Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology · doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2003)023[0373:oocsta]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Horner, J. R., de Ricqlès, A., & Padian, K.
- Venue
- Paleobiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-304
- ISSN
- 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2285964556
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in dinosaur skeletochronology indicators: implications for age assessment and physiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0094837300021308
- The paper
- Horner, J. R., de Ricqlès, A., & Padian, K. (1999). Variation in dinosaur skeletochronology indicators: implications for age assessment and physiology. Paleobiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300021308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.