The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of the brain at global and microscopic scales: Neural networks and the EEG
Abstract
There is some complementarity of models for the origin of the electroencephalogram (EEG) and neural network models for information storage in brainlike systems. From the EEG models of Freeman, of Nunez, and of the authors' group we argue that the wavelike processes revealed in the EEG exhibit linear and near-equilibrium dynamics at macroscopic scale, despite extremely nonlinear – probably chaotic – dynamics at microscopic scale. Simulations of cortical neuronal interactions at global and microscopic scales are then presented. The simulations depend on anatomical and physiological estimates of synaptic densities, coupling symmetries, synaptic gain, dendritic time constants, and axonal delays. It is shown that the frequency content, wave velocities, frequency/wavenumber spectra and response to cortical activation of the electrocorticogram (ECoG) can be reproduced by a “lumped” simulation treating small cortical areas as single-function units. The corresponding cellular neural network simulation has properties that include those of attractor neural networks proposed by Amit and by Parisi. Within the simulations at both scales, sharp transitions occur between low and high cell firing rates. These transitions may form a basis for neural interactions across scale. To maintain overall cortical dynamics in the normal low firing-rate range, interactions between the cortex and the subcortical systems are required to prevent runaway global excitation. Thus, the interaction of cortex and subcortex via corticostriatal and related pathways may partly regulate global dynamics by a principle analogous to adiabatic control of artificial neural networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,161
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors
Grassberger, P., & Procaccia, I. (1983) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1 · Cited by 5,650
Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems
Nìcolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,356
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data
Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., & Doyne Farmer, J. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-s · Cited by 3,732
Eckhorn, R., Bauer, R., Jordan, W., Brosch, M., Kruse, W., Munk, M., & Reitboeck, H. J. (1988) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00202899 · Cited by 2,330
Cited by
The dynamic brain: from spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., Robinson, P. A., Breakspear, M., & Friston, K. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000092 · Cited by 1,084
Cortical coordination dynamics and cognition
Bressler, S. L., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01564-3 · Cited by 786
Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain
Sanz-Leon, P., Knock, S. A., Spiegler, A., & Jirsa, V. K. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.002 · Cited by 356
Spatial spectral analysis of human electrocorticograms including the alpha and gamma bands
Freeman, W. J., Rogers, L. J., Holmes, M. D., & Silbergeld, D. L. (2000) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(99)00160-0 · Cited by 323
Neural masses and fields in dynamic causal modeling
Moran, R., Pinotsis, D. A., & Friston, K. (2013) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00057 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, J. J., & Liley, D. T. J.
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 285-295
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2008984674
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 170
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of the brain at global and microscopic scales: Neural networks and the EEG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0140525x00042679
- The paper
- Wright, J. J., & Liley, D. T. J. (1996). Dynamics of the brain at global and microscopic scales: Neural networks and the EEG. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00042679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.