A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience
Abstract
The well-replicated observation that many people maintain mental health despite exposure to severe psychological or physical adversity has ignited interest in the mechanisms that protect against stress-related mental illness. Focusing on resilience rather than pathophysiology in many ways represents a paradigm shift in clinical-psychological and psychiatric research that has great potential for the development of new prevention and treatment strategies. More recently, research into resilience also arrived in the neurobiological community, posing nontrivial questions about ecological validity and translatability. Drawing on concepts and findings from transdiagnostic psychiatry, emotion research, and behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, we propose a unified theoretical framework for the neuroscientific study of general resilience mechanisms. The framework is applicable to both animal and human research and supports the design and interpretation of translational studies. The theory emphasizes the causal role of stimulus appraisal (evaluation) processes in the generation of emotional responses, including responses to potential stressors. On this basis, it posits that a positive (non-negative) appraisal style is the key mechanism that protects against the detrimental effects of stress and mediates the effects of other known resilience factors. Appraisal style is shaped by three classes of cognitive processes--positive situation classification, reappraisal, and interference inhib…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher loneliness correlated with increased depression among young adults with low resilience.
“They compared depression levels among young adults with high and low resilience, showing that higher loneliness correlated with increased depression among those with low resilience, likely due to stress hormones like cortisol, which can lead to long-term neurological and physiological issues [96].”
From The prospective association of adolescent loneliness and low resilience with anxiety and depression in young adulthood: The HUNT study (2025) · cites this paper as [96]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 331 · Cited by 669
- Authors
- Kalisch, R., Müller, M. B., & Tüscher, O.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-08-27
- Volume
- 38
- Pages
- e92-e92
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2052241245
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 331
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- resilience, stress, emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, interference control, transdiagnostic psychiatry, translational research, prevention
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Resilience, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review