The developmental progression from implicit to explicit knowledge: A computational approach
Abstract
Dienes & Perner (D&P) argue that nondeclarative knowledge can take multiple forms. We provide empirical support for this from two related lines of research about the development of mathematical reasoning. We then describe how different forms of procedural and declarative knowledge can be effectively modeled in Anderson's act-r theory, contrasting this computational approach with D&P's logical approach. The computational approach suggests that the commonly observed developmental progression from more implicit to more explicit knowledge can be viewed as a consequence of accumulating and strengthening mental representations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some KCs represent associations, perceptual categories, skills, or procedures that cannot be readily verbalized.
“Some KCs represent associations, perceptual categories, skills, or procedures that cannot be readily verbalized (cf., Alibali & Koedinger, 1999;Dienes & Perner, 1999).”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Alibali & Koedinger, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Alibali, M. W., & Koedinger, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 755-756
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2012770494
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- tacit knowledge, explicit knowledge, procedural knowledge, declarative knowledge, ACT-R, mental representation, cognitive development, computational modeling of cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review