CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 210Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography

Öney, Banu, Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan·1997·Applied Psycholinguistics
DOI 10.1017/s014271640000984x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate early literacy acquisition in a phonologically transparent orthography with regular letter-sound correspondences. It was considered that Turkish, with its systematic phonological and orthographic structure, would make different demands on the beginning reader than the languages used in many of the previous studies of literacy acquisition. First grade children were assessed using tests of phonological awareness, letter recognition, word and pseudoword recognition, spelling, syntactic awareness, and listening comprehension at the beginning of the school year. The impact of these factors on the development of word recognition, spelling, and reading comprehension was examined. The results strongly suggest that a phonologically transparent orthography fosters the early development of word recognition skills, and that phonological awareness contributes to word recognition in the early stages of reading acquisition. Once the children's word recognition performance is high, listening comprehension ability distinguishes the different levels of reading comprehension among children. These patterns of results were interpreted as reflecting the phonological and orthographic characteristics of the Turkish language and orthography.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s014271640000984x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Perfetti, 1985, Reading ability
  2. de Manrique, 1984, La segmentacion fonologica y silabica en ninos de prescolar y primero grado [Phonologic and syllabic segmentation in preschool and first grade children], Lecturay Vida, 5, 4
  3. Zaretsky, 1995, The influence of spoken language structure on phonological awareness in Russian and English-speaking prereaders
  4. Adams, 1991, Beginning to read
  5. Shankweiler, 1972, Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speech and reading

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 208

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Boğaziçi University (TR)
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
Corresponding author
Öney, Banu
ORCID
Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan
Venue
Applied Psycholinguistics
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1997-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0142-7164 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1817
DOI
10.1017/s014271640000984x
OpenAlex
W2110335717
Cited by
210
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 4349 d)
Locations
Applied Psycholinguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
early literacy acquisition, Turkish language, letter-sound correspondence, phonological awareness, word recognition, pseudoword recognition, spelling, listening comprehension, reading comprehension, first grade students, orthographic transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review