Cited by 18Mathematical Dynamics and FractalsGeometric and Algebraic TopologyGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows

Distribution of intersection lengths of a random geodesic with a geodesic lamination

Open access
BRIDGEMAN, MARTIN, DUMAS, DAVID·2007·Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems

Abstract

We investigate the distribution of lengths obtained by intersecting a random geodesic with a geodesic lamination. We give an explicit formula for the distribution for the case of a maximal lamination and show that the distribution is independent of the surface and lamination. We also show how the moments of the distribution are related to the Riemann zeta function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0143385706001040

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lemma Appendix A.2: For any hyperbolic surface Σp with marking (X,f), the stated identity holds, where χ(Σp) = 2(1-g) is the Euler characteristic; this is a topological invariant.

    “Lemma Appendix A.2. [26, 27] For any hyperbolic surface Σ p with the marking ( X,f ) , we have the following result”

    From Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    Section 5 (page unavailable) gives an identity for a closed hyperbolic surface involving its Euler characteristic: the number of complementary ideal triangles is 2|χ(S)|. The cited paper does not state the claim’s unspecified identity for a surface with marking (X,f), nor does it give χ(Σp)=2(1−g) or explicitly describe χ as a topological invariant. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lemma Appendix A.1: The map (X,f) → L_X is a proper embedding of TΣp into the space of currents Curr(Σp) given by the intersection number.

    “Lemma Appendix A.1. [26, 27] The map ( X,f ) → ˆ L X is a proper embedding of T Σ p into the space of currents Curr (Σ p ) given by the intersection number i that is, for all closed curves α in Σ p ,”

    From Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    Section 2, “Geodesic laminations and geodesic currents” (page unavailable), identifies the Liouville measure of a closed hyperbolic surface as a geodesic current. It does not state that the map from Teichmüller space to currents is a proper embedding or characterize that map by intersection numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A sequence diverging in Teichmüller space converges in the space of projective measured laminations (PML), which is a compact subset of the space of geodesic currents.

    “Here we show that a sequence diverging in Teichmüller space converges in the space of projective measured laminations ( PML ), which is a compact subset of the space of geodesic currents.”

    From Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    Section 2, “Geodesic laminations and geodesic currents” (page not provided), defines geodesic currents but does not discuss PML or Teichmüller space. Searches for Teichmüller space, PML, and compactness found no passage addressing whether a diverging sequence converges in PML. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Francis Bonahon. The geometry of Teichmüller space via geodesic currents. Invent. Math., 92(1):139-162, 1988.
  2. I. P. Cornfeld, S. V. Fomin, and Ya. G. Sinaȋ. Ergodic Theory, volume 245 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982. Translated from the Russian by A. B. Sosinskiȋ.
  3. Peter J. Nicholls. The Ergodic Theory of Discrete Groups, volume 143 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
  4. Walter Rudin. Principles of Mathematical Analysis. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York-Toronto-London, 1953.
  5. Stephen Wolfram. Mathematica: A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer. Addison- Wesley, 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BRIDGEMAN, M., & DUMAS, D.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems
Published
2007-05-03
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
1055-1072
ISSN
  • 0143-3857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4417
OpenAlex
W2125847302
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Keywords
geodesic laminations, Riemann zeta function, moments of distributions, hyperbolic surfaces, ergodic theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review