The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out
Open accessAbstract
Recent literature on intergenerational relations – although giving different explanations – suggests that the giving of money and services to children reinforces the receiving of money and services by elderly people. To explore the flow of support between the generations we present evidence about the type and intensity of the help that elderly people receive from their adult children and their families. By comparing five developed countries we examine whether the amount of family help transferred to older people is shaped by a ‘crowding out’ process, in which more generous welfare systems displace family solidarity. Taking co-residence into account the international comparison does not support the crowding out hypothesis. We then show that the giving of services by older people to their adult children increases the probability that they receive help from them. This indirectly supports the reverse hypothesis, namely that the relationship between the state and the family may be described as a process of ‘crowding in’: generous welfare systems which give resources to elderly people help to increase rather than undermine family solidarity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Cited by
Albertini, M., Kohli, M., & Vogel, C. (2007) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928707081068 · Cited by 631
CAN WE IDENTIFY INTERGENERATIONAL POLICY REGIMES IN EUROPE?
Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2010) · European Societies · doi:10.1080/14616696.2010.483006 · Cited by 527
Social Solidarity and the Gift
Komter, A. E. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614064 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- KÜNEMUND, H., & REIN, M.
- Venue
- Ageing and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-121
- ISSN
- 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1779
- OpenAlex
- W2152577821
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0144686x99007205
- The paper
- KÜNEMUND, H., & REIN, M. (1999). There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x99007205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.