Cited by 19Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration and Labor DynamicsImmigration Law and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Not Every Family: Selective Reunification in Contemporary US Immigration Laws

Hwang, Maria Cecilia, Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar·2010·International Labor and Working-Class History

Abstract

This article questions the notion that family reunification is the cornerstone of US immigration policies and points to the violation of the right to family reunification in US law. It specifically looks at the forcible separation of legal residents from their families, including foreign domestic workers in the Labor Certification Program; US-born children with undocumented relatives, including parents and siblings; and guest workers. We argue that the growing influence of nationalist politics and big businesses trumps the interests of the family in US immigration policies, resulting in the prolonged and forcible separation of working-class and poor migrant families.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0147547910000153

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Ngai, 2004, Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America, 238
  2. 10.1080/713658794 · DOI
  3. 10.1515/9781400836338 · DOI
  4. Colvin, Birthright Citizenship in the United States: Realities of De Facto Deportation and International Comparisons Toward Proposing a Solution, Saint Louis University Law Journal, 53, 291
  5. Sassen, 1996, Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization
  6. 10.1080/0023656032000057010 · DOI
  7. Thai, 2008, For Better or for Worse: Vietnamese International Marriages in the New Global Economy, 16
  8. Aizenman, 2007, Activist's Arrest Highlights Key Immigrant Issue, The Washington Post
  9. Fix, 1999, All under One Roof: Mixed-Status Families in an Era of Reform, Urban Institute
  10. Reimers, 1992, Still the Golden Door: The Third World Comes to America, 2nd ed., 10.7312/reim92964 · DOI
  11. Parreñas, 2006, Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes, 147
  12. Gardner, 2005, The Qualities of a Citizen: Women, Immigration, and Citizenship, 1870–1965, 214, 10.1515/9781400826575 · DOI
  13. 10.1787/migr_outlook-2006-2-en · DOI
  14. Dizon, 2004, The Child Status Protection Act: Does Immigration Math Solve the Family Unity Equation?, Hastings Women's Law Journal, 16, 117
  15. 10.1177/0739986309331881 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hwang, M. C., & Parreñas, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
International Labor and Working-Class History
Published
2010
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
100-109
ISSN
  • 0147-5479 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6445
OpenAlex
W2099968687
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Labor and Working-Class History (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Immigration Law and Human Rights
Keywords
family reunification, United States immigration law, foreign domestic workers, undocumented immigrants, children of undocumented immigrants, guest workers, nationalism, working-class migrants, poor migrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review