Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hospital-Acquired Infections in Intensive Care Unit Patients An Overview with Emphasis on Epidemics

Wenzel, Richard P, Thompson, Robert L., Landry, Sandra M., Russell, Brenda S., Miller, Patti J., de Leon, Samuel Ponce, Miller, Grayson B.·1983·Infection Control

Abstract

Surveillance activities for the detection of nosocomial infections at the University of Virginia Hospital (Charlottesville, Virginia) and at hospitals participating in the Virginia Statewide Infection Control Program have focused on outbreaks and device-related infections which are potentially preventable. Eleven outbreaks of nosocomial infections were identified at the University of Virginia Hospital between January 1, 1978 and December 31, 1982 (9.8 outbreaks/100,000 admissions). Ten of the 11 were centered in critical care units. The 269 patients involved in the epidemics represented 0.2% of all hospital admissions and 3.7% of all patients who developed nosocomial infections. Eight of the 11 outbreaks involved infection of the bloodstream, and the 90 patients who developed a bloodstream infection as part of an epidemic represented 8% of all patients with nosocomial bloodstream infections identified during the five-year study period. The reservoir of the 11 outbreaks involved devices (5), contaminated cocaine (1), probable blood products (1), other patients (3), and nursing personnel (1). Forty-one percent of all nosocomial bloodstream infections and 41% of all nosocomial pneumonias occurred in intensive care units (ICUs). In 38 hospitals in the state of Virginia with ICUs and practitioners who voluntarily reported surveillance data between June 1,1980 and May 31,1982, there were 264,757 patients admitted and a crude infection rate of 3%. Of note is that 1,867 of the 7,407 nosocomial infections (25%) occurred in the ICU patients. Several factors point to a compelling argument that the highest priority in infection control resources be assigned to the prevention and control of ICU infections: ICU patients often have serious device-related infections and may be identified as high risk prior to infection. Furthermore, they are at risk of being infected as part of a major outbreak. Such characteristics define a population of hospitalized patients, many of whose infections are preventable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0195941700059774

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Wenzel, R. P., Thompson, R. L., Landry, S. M., Russell, B. S., Miller, P. J., de Leon, S. P., & Miller, G. B.
Venue
Infection Control
Published
1983-10
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
371-375
ISSN
  • 0195-9417 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-9451
OpenAlex
W1928909115
Cited by
277
References
11
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital-Acquired Infections in Intensive Care Unit Patients An Overview with Emphasis on Epidemics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0195941700059774
The paper
Wenzel, R. P., Thompson, R. L., Landry, S. M., Russell, B. S., Miller, P. J., de Leon, S. P., & Miller, G. B. (1983). Hospital-Acquired Infections in Intensive Care Unit Patients An Overview with Emphasis on Epidemics. Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0195941700059774

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.