The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The postcolonial moment in security studies
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we critique the Eurocentric character of security studies as it has developed since World War II. The taken-for-granted historical geographies that underpin security studies systematically misrepresent the role of the global South in security relations and lead to a distorted view of Europe and the West in world politics. Understanding security relations, past and present, requires acknowledging the mutual constitution of European and non-European worlds and their joint role in making history. The politics of Eurocentric security studies, those of the powerful, prevent adequate understanding of the nature or legitimacy of the armed resistance of the weak. Through analysis of the explanatory and political problems Eurocentrism generates, this article lays the groundwork for the development of a non-Eurocentric security studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jehlen, M., & Said, E. W. (1994) · The William and Mary Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2946944 · Cited by 6,527
Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis
Holsti, O. R., & Allison, G. T. (1972) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/446741 · Cited by 3,658
Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History
Stein, S. J., & Mintz, S. W. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1858145 · Cited by 2,369
Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal
Ortner, S. B. (1995) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417500019587 · Cited by 1,824
The Origins of Totalitarianism
ARENDT, H. (2007) · On Violence · doi:10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.33 · Cited by 1,138
Between Metropole and ColonyRethinking a Research Agenda
Stoler, A. L., & Cooper, F. (1997) · Tensions of EmpireColonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World · doi:10.1525/california/9780520205406.003.0001 · Cited by 765
A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas, 1492 to the Present
Jonassohn, K., & Churchill, W. (1999) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2650994 · Cited by 440
Late Victorian holocausts: El Nino famines and the making of the Third World
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-6200 · Cited by 320
The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany
Coetzee, M. S., Blackbourn, D., & Eley, G. (1985) · German Studies Review · doi:10.2307/1429390 · Cited by 275
Goodison, C. (1997) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-048-08-1997-01_5 · Cited by 224
Cited by
Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace
Sabaratnam, M. (2013) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010613485870 · Cited by 391
What the Haitian Revolution Might Tell Us about Development, Security, and the Politics of Race
Shilliam, R. (2008) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417508000339 · Cited by 69
Baumann, H. (2023) · Politics · doi:10.1177/02633957211054739 · Cited by 8
Political military legacies of empire in world politics
Barkawi, T. (2015) · Legacies of Empire · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316271674.002 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BARKAWI, T., & LAFFEY, M.
- Venue
- Review of International Studies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 329-352
- ISSN
- 0260-2105 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9044
- OpenAlex
- W2149275882
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 77.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The postcolonial moment in security studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0260210506007054
- The paper
- BARKAWI, T., & LAFFEY, M. (2006). The postcolonial moment in security studies. Review of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210506007054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.