The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations
Open accessAbstract
Social legitimacy is central to the effectiveness of international organisations (IOs). Yet, so far, we have little systematic knowledge about what drives citizens to support or oppose IOs. In this article, we isolate and assess three alternative explanations of social legitimacy in global governance, privileging interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation. We test these theories in a multilevel analysis of citizen confidence in the United Nations (UN) using World Values Survey and European Values Study data, supplemented by contextual measures. The results grant support to the arguments that institutional performance and confidence extrapolation shape popular confidence in the UN, while offering little support for the explanation of interest representation. These findings challenge the predominant understanding that more democratic procedures lead to greater social legitimacy for IOs. Instead, the UN case suggests that the social legitimacy of IOs is based primarily on the organisations' capacity to deliver, as well as on citizens' general confidence in political institutions, which IOs may have little to do with and can do little to change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-6408 · Cited by 14,307
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy
Stern, F., & Putnam, R. (1993) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045657 · Cited by 11,137
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014 · Cited by 6,223
Interaction terms in logit and probit models
Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0165-1765(03)00032-6 · Cited by 4,599
Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata
(2006) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00588_16.x · Cited by 4,236
Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?
Scharpf, F. (1999) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001 · Cited by 3,201
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123408000409 · Cited by 3,124
Cited by
Europe's Crisis of Legitimacy: Governing by Rules and Ruling by Numbers in the Eurozone
Schmidt, V. A. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198797050.001.0001 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- DELLMUTH, L. M., & TALLBERG, J.
- Venue
- Review of International Studies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 451-475
- ISSN
- 0260-2105 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9044
- OpenAlex
- W3124915420
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 47.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0260210514000230
- The paper
- DELLMUTH, L. M., & TALLBERG, J. (2015). The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210514000230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.