The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sweet talking: Food, language, and democracy
Abstract
At a time of diminishing resources, the sum of apparently minor personal decisions about food can have immense impact. These individual choices are heavily influenced by language, as those with vested interests seek to persuade individuals to act in certain ways. This makes the language of food politics a fitting area for an expanding applied linguistics oriented towards real-world language-related problems of global and social importance. The paper draws upon five consecutive research projects to show how applied linguistics research may contribute to public policy and debate, and also how, by entering such new arenas, it can develop its own methods and understanding of contemporary language use.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the monolingual approach rests on a number of assumptions that G. Cook (2010) has characterized as empirically untested including views that (1) using the additional language exclusively is more natural and similar to own language acquisition, (2) that students need large amounts of input (Krashen, 1981) in order to acquire an additional language”
From Translanguaging and the Transdisciplinary Framework for Language Teaching and Learning in a Multilingual World (2019) · cites this paper as G. Cook (2010)
In the citing paper
“In the past 100 years or so the central doctrine of the late 19th century Reform Movement in additional language education with its advocacy for monolingual teaching, i.e. teaching the focal language through that language exclusively, has held sway in the foreign/second language education thinking (see Cook, 2010: Chapter 1; Cummins, 2007; Hall and Cook, 2012).”
From Translanguaging and the Transdisciplinary Framework for Language Teaching and Learning in a Multilingual World (2019) · cites this paper as Cook, 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1080/09505430120093586 · DOI
- Thomas P. (ed.) (2008). GM seeds of change or fool's gold. Special issue of The Ecologist November 2008.
- Talbot, 2007, Media discourse: Representation and interaction, 10.1515/9780748630073 · DOI
- Stubbs, 2001, Words and phrases
- Scott M. (2005). Help menu. Wordsmith Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith.
- Robbins, 2004, Future as fairness: Ecological justice and global citizenship, 85, 10.1163/9789401201032_008 · DOI
- Lawrence, 2004, Not on the label
- Gregory, 1998, Science in public
- 10.1177/0963662506058756 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10603-007-9038-1 · DOI
- Brumfit, 1995, Principle and practice in applied linguistics, 27
- 10.1177/0957926504043708 · DOI
- Cook, 2004, Genetically modified language, 10.4324/9780203561232 · DOI
- Vickers, 1988, In defence of rhetoric
- Fromartz, 2006, Organic, INC
- 10.1093/applin/23.2.262 · DOI
- Block, 2008, Language as commodity: Global structures, local marketplaces, 187
- Cook G. (2008). Hysteria and hyperbole – which side is it on? In Thomas (ed.), 30–35.
- Ambler-Edwards, 2009, Food futures: Rethinking UK strategy
- Bakhtin, 1984, Rabelais and his world
- 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
- Cook, 2003, Applied linguistics
- 10.1057/9780230627420_2 · DOI
- Cook, 1999, Language and literacies, 145
- 10.1515/TEXT.2009.007 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LEUNG, C., & VALDÉS, G. (2019) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12568 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, G.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, Guy
- ORCID
- Cook, Guy
- Venue
- Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-181
- ISSN
- 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3049
- OpenAlex
- W2170748116
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- food politics, language and democracy, persuasion, food choice, public policy, applied linguistics, language use, food industry marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
