CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 221Linguistic and Sociocultural StudiesMultilingual Education and PolicyLanguage and Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language, power and identity

Wodak, Ruth·2012·Language Teaching
DOI 10.1017/s0261444811000048
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

How are identities constructed in discourse? How are national and European identities tied to language and communication? And what role does power have – power in discourse, over discourse and of discourse? This paper seeks to identify and analyse processes of identity construction within Europe and at its boundaries, particularly the diversity of sources and forms of expression in several genres and contexts. It draws on media debates on Austrian versus Standard High German, on focus group discussions with migrants in eight European countries and on public and political debates on citizenship in the European Union which screen newly installed language tests. The analysis of different genres and publics all illustrate the complexity of national and transnational identity constructions in a globalised world. What is experienced as European or as outside of Europe is the result of multiple activities, some of them consciously planned in the sense of political, economic or cultural intervention, others more hidden, indirect, in the background. Such developments are contradictory rather than harmonious, proceeding in ‘loops’ and partial regressions (rather than in a linear, uni-directional or teleological way). Thus, an interdisciplinary approach suggests itself which accounts for diverse context-dependent discursive and social practices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0261444811000048

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Clyne M. (2003). Towards inter-cultural communication in Europe without linguistic homogenization. In de Cillia R. , Krumm H.-J. & Wodak R. (eds.), 39–48.
  2. Van Avermaet P. (2010). Language requirements for adult migrants – Results of a survey. Observations and challenges. PowerPoint presentation, Intergovernmental conference, Strasbourg, 24–25 June, 2010. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Programme2010_Texts-MigrantsConf_EN.asp
  3. De Cillia, 2003, The costs of multilingualism: Globalisation and linguistic diversity
  4. Krzyżanowski, 2007, Identity troubles, 95
  5. De Cillia, 2009, Gedenken im ‘Gedankenjahr’
  6. Gal S. (2006). Migration, minorities and multilingualism. In Mar-Molinero C. & Stevenson P. (eds.), 13–28.
  7. Holzscheiter A. (2005). Power of discourse and power in discourse. An investigation of transformation and exclusion in the global discourse of childhood. Ph.D. Thesis, FU, Berlin.
  8. Gal S. (2010). Linguistic regimes and European diversity. Keynote Lecture, Conference ‘New Challenges for Multilingualism in Europe’, Dubrovnik, 12 April, 2010.
  9. Unger J. W. (2009). The discursive construction of Scots. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Linguistics and English Language: Lancaster University.
  10. Adorno, 1966, Negative Dialektik
  11. De Cillia, 2006, Linguists (don't) only talk about it. Essays in Honour of Bernhard Kettemann, 123
  12. Spolsky, 2004, Language policy
  13. Extramiana C. & Van Avermaet P. (2010). Enquête, PowerPoint Presentation, Intergovernmental Conference in Strasbourg, 24–25 June, 2010. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Programme2010_Texts-MigrantsConf_EN.asp.
  14. 2007, Framework for the European survey on language competences
  15. Jones P. & Krzyżanowski M. (2008). Migrant belongings. In Delanty G. (eds.), 84–109.
  16. De Cillia, 1998, Burenwurscht bleibt Burenwurscht: Sprachenpolitik und gesellschaftliche Mehrsprachigkeit in Österreich

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wodak, R.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Wodak, Ruth
ORCID
Wodak, Ruth
Venue
Language Teaching
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2011-03-25
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
215-233
ISSN
  • 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3049
DOI
10.1017/s0261444811000048
OpenAlex
W2167970285
Cited by
221
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
33.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
Keywords
identity construction, language and power, national identity, European identity, transnational identity, discourse analysis, Austrian German, migrants, citizenship, language tests, European Union, language policy, media discourse, discursive power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review