Cited by 11Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare cost, quality, practicesPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Disinvestment Activities and Candidates in the Health Technology Assessment Community: An Online Survey

Open access
Polisena, Julie, Trunk, Gerhard, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki, Joppi, Roberta·2019·International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Abstract

Objectives: As healthcare decision makers continue to face challenges in health services delivery to their patients, disinvestment programs are being established for a sustainable healthcare system. This study aimed to collect data and information by means of a survey of disinvestment candidates and ongoing disinvestment projects in the health technology assessment (HTA) community. Methods: An online survey was conducted to collect information on disinvestment candidates and activities from members of the Health Technology Assessment International Disinvestment & Early Awareness Interest Group, the EuroScan International Network and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Results: Among the 362 invitees, twenty-four unique responses were received, and almost 70 percent were involved in disinvestment initiatives. The disinvestment candidates identified represented a range of health technologies. Evidence or signaling of clinical ineffectiveness or inappropriate use typically led to the nomination of disinvestment candidates. Health technology assessments and reassessments were usually conducted to evaluate the technology in question, and decisions usually led to the limited use of the technology. Barriers to disinvestment decisions included the strength of interest and advocacy groups, insufficient data for assessments, a systematic decision process and political challenges, while obstacles to their implementation were clinicians’ reluctance and insufficient funding and incentives. Conclusions: The survey results suggested that disinvestment activities are occurring in the HTA community, especially in the public sector. Future research can further investigate the processes and methods used to reach and implement disinvestment decisions from our survey respondents and explore to form closer ties between the HTA and clinical communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0266462319000229

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chambers J, Salem M, D'Cruz B, Subedi P, Kamal-Bahl S, Neumann P (2017) A review of empirical analyses of disinvestment initiatives. Value Health 20, 909-918.
  2. Agirrezabal I, Burgon J, Stewart G, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I (2017) Status of disinvestment initiatives in Latin America: Results from a systematic lit- erature review and questionnaire. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 33, 674-680.
  3. De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. (2015) Switzerland: Health system review. Health Syst Transit 17, 1-288.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polisena, J., Trunk, G., Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I., & Joppi, R.
Affiliations
  • Canada's Drug Agency (CA)
  • Federal Office of Public Health (CH)
Corresponding author
Polisena, Julie
Venue
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2019
Volume
35
Issue
03
Pages
189-194
ISSN
  • 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6348
OpenAlex
W2942344870
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Health Technology Assessment international
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
divestiture, health technology assessment, advocacy organizations, health policy decision-making, sustainable health systems
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Organizational, Humans, Politics, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Resource Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review