PP98 Occupational Therapy For Adult Persons With Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic Overview On Clinical Efficacy
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Damage to the central nervous system (CNS) in adulthood, may lead to cognitive impairments. In Germany, occupational therapy is most often prescribed for neurological diagnoses, including stroke and traumatic brain injury (351 and 343 cases per 100,000, respectively in 2018). For cognitive impairments, the primarily prescribed remedies are sensorimotor-perceptive, motor-functional and neuropsychologically oriented treatment or training of cognitive performance. Here we report the results of a health technology assessment (HTA) report on the clinical efficacy of occupational therapy for patients with cognitive impairments. Methods To assess clinical efficacy, a systematic overview was conducted based on published systematic reviews and HTA reports from the last ten years summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from four bibliographic databases. The target population included adult patients with cognitive impairments caused by diseases of the CNS, excluding moderate to severe dementia. The intervention studied is occupational therapy compared to no occupational therapy. Outcomes were cognitive abilities, independence, self-determination, health-related quality of life (QoL), and participation in activities of daily living (ADL). Results Five systematic reviews comprising 1,316 patients were included. There is evidence for a small statistically significant positive effect on “general cognitive function” (10 RCTs, n=470) and on ADL (4 RCTs, n= 405). A non-quantified positive effect was reported on behavior control (1 RCT, n=96), and conflicting evidence on QoL (2 RCTs, n=214). No effect was found for individual components of cognition (5 RCTs, n=202), self-efficacy (1 RCT, n=98) and social participation (2 RCTs, n=194). The level of the evidence was low for all endpoints due to the high risk of bias and small sample sizes. Conclusions Based on this systematic overview, it cannot be demonstrated but also not ruled out that occupational therapy for cognitive impairment is an effective therapy for adults with cognitive impairments. The evidence is very uncertain due to small effects and high risk of bias, low statistical power, and heterogeneity of interventions and study populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to other studies, the effectiveness of the potential benefits of OT interventions remains unclear.
“Nevertheless, according to other studies the effectiveness of the potential benefits of OT interventions remains unclear [52], being the need of further research the main motivation for the current study.”
From Early Occupational Therapy Intervention post-stroke (EOTIPS): A randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
- Authors
- Schnell-Inderst, P., Conrads-Frank, A., Stojkov, I., Krenn, C., Kofler, L.-M., & Siebert, U.
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S72-S73
- ISSN
- 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6348
- PMC
- PMC11738198
- OpenAlex
- W4312156293
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- occupational therapy, cognitive impairment, central nervous system injury, stroke, traumatic brain injury, clinical efficacy, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, self-determination, independence, general intelligence, neuropsychological rehabilitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review