Cited by 0Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

PP98 Occupational Therapy For Adult Persons With Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic Overview On Clinical Efficacy

Open access
Schnell-Inderst, Petra, Conrads-Frank, Annette, Stojkov, Igor, Krenn, Cornelia, Kofler, Lisa-Maria, Siebert, Uwe·2022·International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Abstract

Introduction Damage to the central nervous system (CNS) in adulthood, may lead to cognitive impairments. In Germany, occupational therapy is most often prescribed for neurological diagnoses, including stroke and traumatic brain injury (351 and 343 cases per 100,000, respectively in 2018). For cognitive impairments, the primarily prescribed remedies are sensorimotor-perceptive, motor-functional and neuropsychologically oriented treatment or training of cognitive performance. Here we report the results of a health technology assessment (HTA) report on the clinical efficacy of occupational therapy for patients with cognitive impairments. Methods To assess clinical efficacy, a systematic overview was conducted based on published systematic reviews and HTA reports from the last ten years summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from four bibliographic databases. The target population included adult patients with cognitive impairments caused by diseases of the CNS, excluding moderate to severe dementia. The intervention studied is occupational therapy compared to no occupational therapy. Outcomes were cognitive abilities, independence, self-determination, health-related quality of life (QoL), and participation in activities of daily living (ADL). Results Five systematic reviews comprising 1,316 patients were included. There is evidence for a small statistically significant positive effect on “general cognitive function” (10 RCTs, n=470) and on ADL (4 RCTs, n= 405). A non-quantified positive effect was reported on behavior control (1 RCT, n=96), and conflicting evidence on QoL (2 RCTs, n=214). No effect was found for individual components of cognition (5 RCTs, n=202), self-efficacy (1 RCT, n=98) and social participation (2 RCTs, n=194). The level of the evidence was low for all endpoints due to the high risk of bias and small sample sizes. Conclusions Based on this systematic overview, it cannot be demonstrated but also not ruled out that occupational therapy for cognitive impairment is an effective therapy for adults with cognitive impairments. The evidence is very uncertain due to small effects and high risk of bias, low statistical power, and heterogeneity of interventions and study populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0266462322002252

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to other studies, the effectiveness of the potential benefits of OT interventions remains unclear.

    “Nevertheless, according to other studies the effectiveness of the potential benefits of OT interventions remains unclear [52], being the need of further research the main motivation for the current study.”

Authors
Schnell-Inderst, P., Conrads-Frank, A., Stojkov, I., Krenn, C., Kofler, L.-M., & Siebert, U.
Venue
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2022-12
Volume
38
Issue
S1
Pages
S72-S73
ISSN
  • 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6348
OpenAlex
W4312156293
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
occupational therapy, cognitive impairment, central nervous system injury, stroke, traumatic brain injury, clinical efficacy, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, self-determination, independence, general intelligence, neuropsychological rehabilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review