The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TESTING FOR TREND
Abstract
The paper examines various tests for assessing whether a time series model requires a slope component. We first consider the simple t-test on the mean of first differences and show that it achieves high power against the alternative hypothesis of a stochastic nonstationary slope and also against a purely deterministic slope. The test may be modified, parametrically or nonparametrically, to deal with serial correlation. Using both local limiting power arguments and finite-sample Monte Carlo results, we compare the t-test with the nonparametric tests of Vogelsang (1998, Econometrica 66, 123–148) and with a modified stationarity test. Overall the t-test seems a good choice, particularly if it is implemented by fitting a parametric model to the data. When standardized by the square root of the sample size, the simple t-statistic, with no correction for serial correlation, has a limiting distribution if the slope is stochastic. We investigate whether it is a viable test for the null hypothesis of a stochastic slope and conclude that its value may be limited by an inability to reject a small deterministic slope.The second author thanks the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for support as part of a project on Dynamic Common Factor Models for Regional Time Series, grant L138 25 1008. Support from the Bank of Italy is also gratefully acknowledged. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the meeting on Frontiers in Time Series held in Olbia, Italy, in June 2005 and at the NSF/NBER Time Series conference in Heidelberg, Germany, in September 2005; we are grateful to several participants for helpful comments. We also thank Peter Phillips, Robert Taylor, Jesus Gonzalo, and a number of other participants at the Unit Root and Co-integration Testing meeting in Faro, Portugal, for helpful comments. We are grateful to Paulo Rodrigues and two referees for their comments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y · Cited by 12,633
Risk Aversion, Wealth, and Background Risk
Guiso, L., & Paiella, M. (2008) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2008.6.6.1109 · Cited by 1,057
Cited by
POLITICIANS AT WORK: THE PRIVATE RETURNS AND SOCIAL COSTS OF POLITICAL CONNECTIONS
Cingano, F., & Pinotti, P. (2013) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12001 · Cited by 561
Family succession and firm performance: Evidence from Italian family firms
Cucculelli, M., & Micucci, G. (2008) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001 · Cited by 512
PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH MONOTONE MEAN‐VARIANCE PREFERENCES
Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A., & Taboga, M. (2009) · Mathematical Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9965.2009.00376.x · Cited by 426
Disentangling demand and supply in credit developments: A survey-based analysis for Italy
Del Giovane, P., Eramo, G., & Nobili, A. (2011) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.03.001 · Cited by 417
The financing of small innovative firms: the Italian case
Magri, S. (2009) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438590701738016 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Busetti, F., & Harvey, A.
- Venue
- Econometric Theory
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 01
- ISSN
- 0266-4666 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4360
- OpenAlex
- W3121991441
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 92.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TESTING FOR TREND. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0266466608080055
- The paper
- Busetti, F., & Harvey, A. (2008). TESTING FOR TREND. Econometric Theory. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466608080055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.