The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmospheric deposition and net retention of ions by the canopy in a tropical montane forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica
Abstract
Meteorological variables, bulk cloud water and precipitation (BCWP), and bulk precipitation (BP) were measured above the canopy, and throughfall (TF; n = 20) was collected beneath an epiphyte-laden canopy of a tropical montane forest (TMF) for 1 y at Monteverde, Costa Rica. Total deposition (cloud + wet + dry) of inorganic ions to the canopy was estimated using a sodium (Na+) mass balance technique. Annual BCWP and BP depths were 2678 mm and 1792 for events where mean windspeeds (u) ≥ 2 m s&supminus1;, and 4077 mm and 3191 mm for all events, respectively. Volume-weighted mean pH and concentrations of nitrate-N (NO 3−-N) and ammonium-N (NH 4+-N) were 4.88, 0.09 and 0.09 mg l&supminus1; in BCWP, and 5.00, 0.05 and 0.05 mg l&supminus1; in BP, respectively. Cloud water and mist deposition to the canopy was estimated to be 356 mm. Estimated deposition of free acidity (H+), NO 3−-N, and NH 4+-N to the canopy was 0.49, 3.4 and 3.4 kg ha&supminus1; y&supminus1;, respectively. Mean TF depth was 1054 ± 83 mm (mean ± S.E.) for events where u ≥ 2 m s&supminus1;, and 2068 ± 132 mm for all events. Volume-weighted mean pH and concentrations of NO 3−-N and NH 4+-N in TF were 5.72, 0.04 mg l&supminus1;, and 0.07 mg l&supminus1;, respectively. Mean fluxes of H+, NO 3−-N, and NH 4+-N in TF were 0.04 ± 0.01, 0.6 ± 0.2 and 1.3 ± 0.2 kg ha&supminus1; y&supminus1;, and percent net retention of these ions by the canopy was 92 ± 2, 80 ±6, and 61 ± 6%, respectively. Phosphate, potassium, calcium and magnesium were leached from the canopy. Seasonal data suggest that biomass burning increased concentrations of NO 3− and NH 4+ in cloud water and precipitation at the end of the dry season. Regardless, a large majority of the inorganic N in atmospheric deposition was retained by the canopy at this site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees?
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.015 · Cited by 1,454
Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain
Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L., & Campbell, J. H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19297 · Cited by 1,429
Hydrometeorology of tropical montane cloud forests: emerging patterns
Bruijnzeel, L. A., Mulligan, M., & Scatena, F. N. (2011) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.7974 · Cited by 372
Stevenson, P. R., & Guzmán‐Caro, D. C. (2010) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.20852 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- CLARK, K. L., NADKARNI, N. M., SCHAEFER, D., & GHOLZ, H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Tropical Ecology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-45
- ISSN
- 0266-4674 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7831
- OpenAlex
- W2059034291
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric deposition and net retention of ions by the canopy in a tropical montane forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0266467498000030
- The paper
- CLARK, K. L., NADKARNI, N. M., SCHAEFER, D., & GHOLZ, H. L. (1998). Atmospheric deposition and net retention of ions by the canopy in a tropical montane forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467498000030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.