Tactility and the Body in Early Chinese Medicine
Abstract
If visual inspection of corpses was central to the development of anatomy in modern Europe, one may ask which of the senses was important for the emergence of the predominant currents of scholarly medical knowledge and practice in third- and second-century B.C.E. China? This article argues that it was tactile perception prompted by a tactile exploration of living bodies. The evidence, derived from a close reading of the Mawangdui medical manuscripts, the 105th chapter of the Records of the Historian, and selected passages from the Huang Di's Inner Canon, points to three important trends: first, the tactile exploration of the extremities led to a rich vocabulary of compound words for pain as localized in specific body parts; second, the tactile exploration of the mai gave rise to an even richer vocabulary on qualities of touch in pulse diagnostics; and third, the tactile exploration of the abdomen led to the assessment of the quality of the internal viscera with words that generally were used for describing the tactile quality of skin and flesh. This finding may appear surprising in the light of later developments during the dynastic history of Chinese medicine where tactile exploration of abdomen and extremities would appear unseemly. The author suggests that extensive tactile explorations of the body were possible before Confucius' teachings became a predominant aspect of state ideology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Daniel and Hsu stress that pulse diagnosis acts as a context for training a participatory sensitivity quite at odds with official biomedical approaches.
“Both Daniel and Hsu stress ways in which pulse diagnosis acts as a context for training a particular type of participatory sensitivity quite at odds with official biomedical approaches.”
From Tibetan Medicine and Biomedicine: Epistemological Conflicts, Practical Solutions (2006) · cites this paper as Hsu 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tibetan Medicine and Biomedicine: Epistemological Conflicts, Practical Solutions
Samuel, G. B. (2006) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/157342106777996501 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hsu, E.
- Venue
- Science in Context
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-34
- ISSN
- 0269-8897 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0664
- OpenAlex
- W2099311010
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science in Context (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Keywords
- tactile perception, Shiji, pulse diagnosis, body parts, sensory knowledge, history of anatomy, Confucianism and medicine
- MeSH terms
- Anatomy, China, Diagnosis, Dissection, Humans, Pain, Physical Examination, Touch, History, Ancient
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review