Cited by 25History of Medicine StudiesTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesHistory of Science and Medicine

Tactility and the Body in Early Chinese Medicine

Hsu, Elisabeth·2005·Science in Context

Abstract

If visual inspection of corpses was central to the development of anatomy in modern Europe, one may ask which of the senses was important for the emergence of the predominant currents of scholarly medical knowledge and practice in third- and second-century B.C.E. China? This article argues that it was tactile perception prompted by a tactile exploration of living bodies. The evidence, derived from a close reading of the Mawangdui medical manuscripts, the 105th chapter of the Records of the Historian, and selected passages from the Huang Di's Inner Canon, points to three important trends: first, the tactile exploration of the extremities led to a rich vocabulary of compound words for pain as localized in specific body parts; second, the tactile exploration of the mai gave rise to an even richer vocabulary on qualities of touch in pulse diagnostics; and third, the tactile exploration of the abdomen led to the assessment of the quality of the internal viscera with words that generally were used for describing the tactile quality of skin and flesh. This finding may appear surprising in the light of later developments during the dynastic history of Chinese medicine where tactile exploration of abdomen and extremities would appear unseemly. The author suggests that extensive tactile explorations of the body were possible before Confucius' teachings became a predominant aspect of state ideology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0269889705000335

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Daniel and Hsu stress that pulse diagnosis acts as a context for training a participatory sensitivity quite at odds with official biomedical approaches.

    “Both Daniel and Hsu stress ways in which pulse diagnosis acts as a context for training a particular type of participatory sensitivity quite at odds with official biomedical approaches.”

Cited by

Authors
Hsu, E.
Venue
Science in Context
Published
2005-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
7-34
ISSN
  • 0269-8897 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0664
OpenAlex
W2099311010
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
23.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science in Context (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
Keywords
tactile perception, Shiji, pulse diagnosis, body parts, sensory knowledge, history of anatomy, Confucianism and medicine
MeSH terms
Anatomy, China, Diagnosis, Dissection, Humans, Pain, Physical Examination, Touch, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review