CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 346Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCategorization, perception, and language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Discourse Motivations for Some Cognitive Acquisition Principles

Andersen, Roger W., Shirai, Yasuhiro·1994·Studies in Second Language Acquisition
DOI 10.1017/s0272263100012845
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper offers an alternative interpretation for what has been called the defective tense hypothesis, the primacy of aspect hypothesis, or simply the aspect hypothesis in the literature on first and second language acquisition of tense and aspect. The aspect hypothesis states that first and second language learners will initially be influenced by the inherent semantic aspect of verbs or predicates in the acquisition of tense and aspect markers associated with or affixed to these verbs. Our account focuses on the observation that adult native speakers also appear to adhere to this primacy of inherent semantic aspect in the relative quantitative distribution of tense-aspect markers in their speech. We argue that a small set of cognitive operating principles and the notion of prototypicality account for this behavior in learners. Moreover, we argue that these principles are a consequence of how learners and native speakers alike organize information and their perspectives on it in ongoing discourse.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263100012845

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Economides P. J. (1985). The expression of tense and aspect in the English interlanguage of a Vietnamese child. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  2. Yoshitomi, 1992, Primacy of aspect: Additional support for the hypothesis based on an interlanguage analysis of a Chinese speaker's ESL
  3. Slobin, 1985, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issues, 1157
  4. Robison R. E. (1993). Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. A cross-sectional study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
  5. Rothstein G. (1985). The expression of temporality in the English interlanguage of a native Hebrew speaker. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  6. Mourelatos, 1981, Syntax and semantics: Vol. 14. Tense and aspect, 191
  7. Mishina, 1993, Second language acquisition of verb morphology by three Japanese speakers
  8. Nixon N. (1986). Tense/aspect in the English interlanguage of a native Mandarin speaker. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  9. Taylor, 1987, Tense/aspect: A longitudinal study of a native Spanish speaker
  10. Shirai, 1988, An interlanguage analysis of a Japanese ESL learner
  11. Aksu A. A. (1978). Aspect and modality in the child's acquisition of the Turkish past tense. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  12. Andersen, 1989, Variation in second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic issues, 46
  13. Andersen, 1986, The need for native language comparison data in interpreting second language data
  14. Andersen, Handbook of language acquisition
  15. Shirai, 1990, The defective tense hypothesis: Is there a distributional bias in the input?
  16. Flashner V. (1982). The English interlanguage of three native speakers of Russian: Two perspectives. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  17. Andersen, 1989, La adquisición de la morfología verbal [The acquisition of verb morphology], Lingüística, 1, 90
  18. Bardovi-Harlig K. , & Bergström A. (1993, 02). Tense and aspect in SLA and FLL Learner narratives in English (SL) and French (FL). Paper presented at the 3rd SLA-FLL Conference (Second language Acquisition–Foreign Language Learning), West Lafayette, IN.
  19. Chung, 1985, Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202
  20. Bergström, 1993, The expression of temporal reference by English speaking learners of French: Report on the cloze
  21. Wenzell, 1989, Transfer in language production, 71
  22. Kihlstedt, 1992, Problem, process, product in language learning: Papers from the Stockholm-Abo Conference, 21
  23. Andersen, 1993, Progression and regression in language, 309
  24. Shirai Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  25. Ramsay, 1989, Proceedings of the fourth meeting of the Pacific Linguistics conference, 374
  26. Comrie, 1976, Aspect
  27. Hopper, 1979, Syntax and semantics: Vol. 14. Discourse and syntax, 213
  28. Lee H. S. (1991). Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  29. Ramsay V. (1989b, 12). On the debate over the acquisition of aspect before tense: Setting the record straight. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
  30. Long, 1984, Interlanguage, 253
  31. Huang C. (1993). Distributional biases of verb morphology in native and non-native English discourse. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  32. Cushing, 1987, Use of verb morphology in the English interlanguage of a native speaker of Serahuli
  33. Labov, 1972, Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular, 354
  34. Stephany, 1981, Child language: An international perspective, 45
  35. Kumpf, 1984, Universal of second language acquisition, 132

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 346

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Daito Bunka University (JP)
ORCID
Shirai, Yasuhiro
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1994-06
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
133-156
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
DOI
10.1017/s0272263100012845
OpenAlex
W2088303151
Cited by
346
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
31.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 5273 d)
Locations
Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
aspect hypothesis, prototypicality, discourse structure, first language acquisition, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review