OUTPUT, INPUT ENHANCEMENT, AND THE NOTICING HYPOTHESIS: An Experimental Study on ESL Relativization
Abstract
This study investigates the potentially facilitative effects of internal and external attention-drawing devices—output and visual input enhancement—on the acquisition of English relativization by adult English as a second language (ESL) learners. Specifically, the study addresses: (a) whether the act of producing output promotes noticing of formal elements in the target language (TL) input and affects subsequent learning of the form; and (b) whether such output- induced noticing and learning, if any, would be the same as that effected by visual input enhancement designed to draw learners' attention to problematic form features in the input. These questions were examined in a controlled experimental study in which the requirements of output and exposure to enhanced input were systematically varied. A computer-assisted reconstruction and reading task was used as the vehicle of presentation of the target input materials. The major findings are: (a) Those engaged in output-input activities outperformed those exposed to the same input for the sole purpose of comprehension in learning gains; (b) those who received visual input enhancement failed to show measurable gains in learning, despite the documented positive impact of enhancement on the noticing of the target form items in the input; and (c) in view of the above, no support was found for the hypothesis that the effect of input enhancement was comparable to that of output. The subsequent discussion centers on reexamining the c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect on acquisition of noticing a hole or gap through output is significantly greater than the effect of noticing through input.
“Izumi's (2002) research indicates that the effect on acquisition of noticing a hole or gap through output was significantly greater than the effect of noticing through input.”
From The Four Strands (2007) · cites this paper as Izumi's (2002)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 524
- Authors
- Izumi, S.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-28
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-577
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2139167691
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 70.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
- Keywords
- noticing hypothesis, ESL learners, second language acquisition, noticing, computer-assisted reconstruction, reading comprehension, levels of processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review