Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

L2 ENGLISH INTONATION: Relations between Form-Meaning Associations, Access to Meaning, and L1 Transfer

Ortega-Llebaria, Marta, Colantoni, Laura·2014·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

Although there is consistent evidence that higher levels of processing, such as learning the form-meaning associations specific to the second language (L2), are a source of difficulty in acquiring L2 speech, no study has addressed how these levels interact in shaping L2 perception and production of intonation. We examine the hypothesis of whether access to contextual meaning increases the chances of first language (L1) influence on L2 intonation. To test this hypothesis, we compared the perception and production of sentential English focus by 27 advanced English language learners (n= 13 L1 Mandarin speakers;n= 14 L1 Spanish speakers) and 13 controls, through a series of tasks that promoted different levels of access to meaning. Results showed that L1 transfer was especially clear in Spanish speakers. Not only did they consistently differ from controls in their perception of focalized verbs and subjects, showing their L1 bias to perceive focus at the end of a sentence, but they were also the only group of speakers that inserted pauses after the focalized word, which showed strong L1 effects. Moreover, these L1 transfer effects were more obvious in contextualized tasks, which indicated that facilitating access to meaning by adding context increased L1 transfer effects on the perception and especially on the production of focus intonation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263114000011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Zubizarreta, 1998, Prosody, focus, and word order
  2. 10.1017/CBO9781139164559 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.013 · DOI
  4. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 · DOI
  5. 10.1121/1.1380437 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00031-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.005 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/CBO9781139166973 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Flege, 1995, Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 233
  10. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.006 · DOI
  11. 10.1515/iral.1989.27.1.23 · DOI
  12. 10.1017/CBO9780511616983 · DOI
  13. Vallduví, 1991, ESCOL ’90: Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern State Conference in Linguistics, 295
  14. Toledo, 1989, Señales prosódicas de foco [Prosodic focus marking], Revista Argentina de lingüística, 5, 205
  15. 10.1177/00238309030460040201 · DOI
  16. Chen, 2001, EUROSPEECH-2001, 1403
  17. Meyer, 1969, Frog, where are you?
  18. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.009 · DOI
  19. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500 · DOI
  20. Pisoni, 1994, The development of speech perception, 121
  21. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.001 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00055-7 · DOI
  24. McGory, 1997, Acquisition of intonational prominence in English by Seoul Korean and Mandarin Chinese speakers
  25. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0040 · DOI
  26. Liu, 2009, Intonation systems of Mandarin and English: A functional approach
  27. 10.1515/prbs.2001.004 · DOI
  28. Best, 1994, The development of speech perception: Transition from speech sounds to spoken words, 167
  29. Howie, 1976, Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones
  30. Nava, 2009, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008), 175
  31. Bolinger, 1989, Intonation and its uses, 10.1515/9781503623125 · DOI
  32. 10.1159/000028487 · DOI
  33. Cruz-Ferreira, 1984, Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 565, 10.1515/9783110884685-088 · DOI
  34. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00093-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0086 · DOI
  37. Blicher, 1990, Effects of syllable duration on the perception of Mandarin tone 2/tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement, Journal of Phonetics, 18, 37, 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30357-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Colantoni, L.
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
2014-05-20
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
331-353
ISSN
  • 0272-2631
  • 1470-1545
Cited by
46
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review