The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
L2 ENGLISH INTONATION: Relations between Form-Meaning Associations, Access to Meaning, and L1 Transfer
Abstract
Although there is consistent evidence that higher levels of processing, such as learning the form-meaning associations specific to the second language (L2), are a source of difficulty in acquiring L2 speech, no study has addressed how these levels interact in shaping L2 perception and production of intonation. We examine the hypothesis of whether access to contextual meaning increases the chances of first language (L1) influence on L2 intonation. To test this hypothesis, we compared the perception and production of sentential English focus by 27 advanced English language learners (n= 13 L1 Mandarin speakers;n= 14 L1 Spanish speakers) and 13 controls, through a series of tasks that promoted different levels of access to meaning. Results showed that L1 transfer was especially clear in Spanish speakers. Not only did they consistently differ from controls in their perception of focalized verbs and subjects, showing their L1 bias to perceive focus at the end of a sentence, but they were also the only group of speakers that inserted pauses after the focalized word, which showed strong L1 effects. Moreover, these L1 transfer effects were more obvious in contextualized tasks, which indicated that facilitating access to meaning by adding context increased L1 transfer effects on the perception and especially on the production of focus intonation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This makes nuclearity particularly challenging for Spanish speakers learning English (del Saz & Grau, 2022;Frota & Prieto, 2015;Hoot & Leal, 2020;Landblom & Ionin, 2022;Ortega-Llebaria & Colantoni, 2014;Zubizarreta & Nava, 2011).”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Ortega-Llebaria & Colantoni, 2014
In the citing paper
“This interpretation is consistent with previous work showing that Spanish-speaking learners often struggle with English accentual patterns that do not follow the LLI rule (del Saz & Grau, 2022;Landblom & Ionin, 2022;Ortega-Llebaria & Colantoni, 2014).”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Ortega-Llebaria & Colantoni, 2014
Citations
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Zubizarreta, 1998, Prosody, focus, and word order
- 10.1017/CBO9781139164559 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.013 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.1380437 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00031-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139166973 · DOI · Paper page
- Flege, 1995, Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 233
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1515/iral.1989.27.1.23 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511616983 · DOI
- Vallduví, 1991, ESCOL ’90: Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern State Conference in Linguistics, 295
- Toledo, 1989, Señales prosódicas de foco [Prosodic focus marking], Revista Argentina de lingüística, 5, 205
- 10.1177/00238309030460040201 · DOI
- Chen, 2001, EUROSPEECH-2001, 1403
- Meyer, 1969, Frog, where are you?
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500 · DOI
- Pisoni, 1994, The development of speech perception, 121
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00055-7 · DOI
- McGory, 1997, Acquisition of intonational prominence in English by Seoul Korean and Mandarin Chinese speakers
- 10.1006/jpho.1996.0040 · DOI
- Liu, 2009, Intonation systems of Mandarin and English: A functional approach
- 10.1515/prbs.2001.004 · DOI
- Best, 1994, The development of speech perception: Transition from speech sounds to spoken words, 167
- Howie, 1976, Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones
- Nava, 2009, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008), 175
- Bolinger, 1989, Intonation and its uses, 10.1515/9781503623125 · DOI
- 10.1159/000028487 · DOI
- Cruz-Ferreira, 1984, Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 565, 10.1515/9783110884685-088 · DOI
- 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes · DOI
- 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00093-0 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.1999.0086 · DOI
- Blicher, 1990, Effects of syllable duration on the perception of Mandarin tone 2/tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement, Journal of Phonetics, 18, 37, 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30357-2 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511808814 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barra–García, C. F., Véliz-Campos, M., Figueroa Candia, M. A., Pereira-Reyes, Y., & Kartsevski Dune, M. (2026) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2026.55.04
Metadata
- Authors
- Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Colantoni, L.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-20
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-353
- ISSN
- 0272-2631
- 1470-1545
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review