The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ULTIMATE ATTAINMENT IN L2 PHONOLOGY: The Critical Factors of Age, Motivation, and Instruction
Abstract
Within both first and second language acquisition research, a critical or sensitive period for complete attainment has largely been substantiated in phonological studies, although it is questionable whether age should be examined in isolation from sociopsychological influences and the extent of exposure to the second language. This study sets out to challenge the Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) by examining phonological performance among highly motivated subjects who use German daily as graduate student instructors and who have been immersed in the language through in-country residence, augmented by years of instruction in both language- and content-based courses. The methodology developed seeks to expand the realm of factors that are potentially conflated with age, such as instruction, motivation, suprasegmental training, and self-perception of productive accuracy, and other factors that have not been addressed in previous studies on ultimate attainment. Production tasks target sounds difficult for nonnative speakers (NNSs) according to contrastive analysis, and task types range in complexity from isolated words to sentences, paragraphs, and free speech. A mean rating was computed for each speaker, including native speaker controls, according to native speaker judgments. When averaged across all tasks, nonnative speaker performance did not overlap with native performance. However, several variables correlated significantly with outcome, including suprasegmental training, which indicated performance closer to native level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Biological Foundations of Language
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · Cited by 6,605
Maturational constraints on language development.
Long, M. H. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009165 · Cited by 1,090
The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. (1978) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1128751 · Cited by 607
Age, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition
Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A., & Scarcella, R. C. (1979) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586451 · Cited by 581
An Instrumental Motivation In Language Study: Who Says It Isn't Effective?
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009724 · Cited by 472
Cited by
THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100004022 · Cited by 1,432
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x · Cited by 815
On the Evidence for Maturational Constraints in Second-Language Acquisition
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2750 · Cited by 643
Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview
Birdsong, D. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x · Cited by 544
The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310808073x · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyer, A.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-108
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W1963754159
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ULTIMATE ATTAINMENT IN L2 PHONOLOGY: The Critical Factors of Age, Motivation, and Instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0272263199001035
- The paper
- Moyer, A. (1999). ULTIMATE ATTAINMENT IN L2 PHONOLOGY: The Critical Factors of Age, Motivation, and Instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263199001035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.