The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated young children's ability to use narrative contexts to infer the meanings of novel vocabulary items. Two groups of 15 seven- to eight-year olds participated: children with normally developing reading comprehension skill and children with weak reading comprehension skill. The children read short stories containing a novel word and were required to produce a meaning for the novel word, both before and after its useful defining context. The proximity of the novel word to this context was manipulated. The results supported the hypothesis that children with weak reading comprehension skills are impaired in their ability to integrate information within a text, particularly when that information is non-adjacent and the processing demands are, therefore, high. Analysis of the error data revealed a similar pattern of types of errors for both groups: children with poor reading comprehension were not more likely to produce a thematically inappropriate response than their skilled peers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Morphological and contextual inferencing have both been found to be related to decoding, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills.
“Morphological and contextual inferencing have largely been investigated separately in the literature on reading development, and both have been found to be related to decoding, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills (e.g., Cain, Oakhill, & Elbro, 2003;McCutchen & Logan, 2011;Zhang & Shulley, 2017).”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Cain, Oakhill, & Elbro, 2003
Young readers can use context and morphology in their word meaning inferences.
“Our research confirms findings from the literature that young readers can use context and morphology in their word meaning inferences (e.g., Cain et al., 2003;Joseph & Nation, 2018;McCutchen & Logan, 2011;Ricketts et al., 2011;Zhang & Shulley, 2017)”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Cain et al., 2003
Earlier research has shown an association between contextual inferencing and reading comprehension.
“This is in line with earlier research showing an association between contextual inferencing and reading comprehension (e.g., Cain et al., 2003;Ricketts et al., 2011).”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Cain et al., 2003
Conceptual overlap between the cloze reading comprehension task and lexical inferencing is unlikely to fully explain the association between reading comprehension and contextual inferencing.
“However, as previous research has found an association between open-ended reading comprehension questions and lexical inferencing (Cain et al., 2003;Ricketts et al., 2011), conceptual overlap between the tasks is unlikely to fully explain the association.”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Cain et al., 2003
Cites
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747758 · Cited by 1,249 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219411410042 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension
Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron, R. W. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Language and Reading Research Consortium, Currie, N. K., & Muijselaar, M. M. L. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000342 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10122-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- CAIN, K., OAKHILL, J. V., & ELBRO, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 681-694
- ISSN
- 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7602
- OpenAlex
- W2153915787
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Child Language (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- vocabulary acquisition, reading comprehension difficulties, narrative context, novel words, elementary school students, contextual integration, error analysis
- MeSH terms
- Child, Female, Humans, Language, Linguistics, Male, Semantic Differential, Case-Control Studies, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review