The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners?
Abstract
Children are thought to learn second languages (L2s) using primarily implicit mechanisms, in contrast to adults, who primarily rely on explicit language learning. This difference is usually attributed to cognitive maturation, but adults also receive more explicit instruction than children, which may influence their learning strategies. This study crosses instruction condition with age, teaching forty children aged 5;3 to 7;11 and forty adults an artificial mini-language under implicit or explicit training conditions. Participants produced novel sentences and judged sentence grammaticality equally well in either condition, but both children and adults in the explicit training condition developed greater awareness of the mini-language's structures – and greater awareness was associated with better performance for both age groups. Results show that explicit instruction affects children and adults in the same way, supporting the hypothesis that age differences in implicit vs. explicit L2 learning are not exclusively caused by maturation, but also influenced by instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This pattern supports the observation that younger children often excel at implicit learning tasks (Lichtman, 2016).”
From Harnessing Dual Memory Systems: A Balanced Approach to Explicit and Implicit Reading Instruction for Young EFL Learners (2026) · cites this paper as Lichtman, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study
Ellis, R. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050096 · Cited by 1,032
Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x · Cited by 746
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/090) · DOI
- Bley-Vroman, 1990, The logical problem of foreign language learning, Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3
- Lenneberg, 1967, Biological foundations of language, 10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · DOI · Paper page
- Unsworth, 2005, On the syntax–semantics interface in Dutch: adult and child L2 acquisition compared, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 173
- Schmidt, 1994, Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 165
- Krashen, 1982, Child–adult differences in second language acquisition
- 10.1075/lald.46.14blo · DOI
- Dunn, 2007, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
- 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0041) · DOI
- Schwartz, 2004, Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2003, 47
- 10.1017/S0142716404001134 · DOI
- Muñoz, 2006, Age and the rate of foreign language learning, 10.21832/9781853598937 · DOI
- Ellis, 2009, Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching, 3, 10.21832/9781847691767-003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00554.x · DOI
- 10.1075/sibil.18 · DOI
- DeKeyser, 2005, Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches, 88
- 10.1017/S0272263197002064 · DOI
- DeKeyser, 2000, The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499, 10.1017/S0272263100004022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0013648 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1044/jshr.3801.168 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716410000056 · DOI · Paper page
- Curtain, 2010, Languages and children: making the match. New languages for young learners, grades K-8
- 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226310001425X · DOI
- 10.1075/sibil.40 · DOI · Paper page
- Zdorenko, 2011, Articles in child L2 English: when L1 and L2 acquisition meet at the interface, First Language, 1, 1
- Bialystok, 1994, Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 549
- 10.1017/S1366728901000220 · DOI
- 10.1075/sibil.39 · DOI
- DeKeyser, 2003, Handbook of second language acquisition, 313
- Housen, 2006, Investigations in instructed second language acquisition, 1
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00017.x · DOI
- Singleton, 2004, Language acquisition: the age factor, 10.21832/9781853597596 · DOI
- Torras, 2006, Age and the rate of foreign language learning, 156, 10.21832/9781853598937-009 · DOI
- Larson-Hall, 2010, A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS
- 10.1017/S0142716403000079 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-74124-1 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263199004015 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Harley, 1998, French second language education in Canada: empirical studies, 177
- 10.1515/IRAL.2008.009 · DOI
- 10.1080/10489223.2013.766740 · DOI
- 10.1191/0265659007072143 · DOI
- Morgan-Short K. (2007). A neurolinguistic investigation of late-learned second language knowledge: the effects of implicit and explicit conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KASPROWICZ, R. E., MARSDEN, E., & SEPHTON, N. (2019) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12586 · Cited by 47
Kim, J. M. (2026) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2026.2735234
Metadata
- Authors
- LICHTMAN, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016-02-26
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 707-730
- ISSN
- 0305-0009
- 1469-7602
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0305000915000598
- The paper
- LICHTMAN, K. (2016). Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners? Journal of Child Language. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000915000598