The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use
Abstract
This study investigated the extent to which the nature of verb input accounts for the order in which children acquire verbs. We assessed the nature of verb input using a combined sample of the speech of 57 mothers addressing their Stage I children. We assessed the order of verb acquisition using as our database a combined sample of those children's speech 10 weeks later and using as our measure of order of acquisition the frequency of verb occurrence. The first set of analyses established the validity of this measure of acquisition order by comparing it with order of acquisition data obtained from checklist and diary data. The second set of analyses revealed that three properties of the input were significant predictors of the order of acquisition of the 25 verbs that were the focus of this study. The predictive properties of input were the total frequency, final position frequency, and diversity of syntactic environments in which the verbs appeared. These findings suggest that the way verbs appear in input influences their ease of acquisition. More specifically, the effect of syntactic diversity in input provides support for the syntactic bootstrapping account of how children use structural information to learn the meaning of new verbs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, the finding of an interaction between frequency and utterance position (e.g. Naigles & Hoff-Ginsberg, 1998) suggests that we need to posit a learning mechanism that is sensitive to temporal order, rather than, for example, a mechanism that processes entire input sequences one batch at a time.”
From The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition (2015) · cites this paper as Naigles & Hoff-Ginsberg, 1998
In the citing paper
“In their study of verb acquisition, Naigles and Hoff-Ginsberg (1998) found that, in addition to overall input frequency, input frequency in utterance-final position was a significant predictor of age of acquisition.”
From The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition (2015) · cites this paper as Naigles and Hoff-Ginsberg (1998)
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings
Gleitman, L. (1990) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1207/s15327817la0101_2 · Cited by 1,783
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoff, E. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00612 · Cited by 2,346
How social contexts support and shape language development☆
HOFF, E. (2006) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002 · Cited by 1,853
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
AMBRIDGE, B., KIDD, E., ROWLAND, C. F., & THEAKSTON, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500091400049x · Cited by 589
A construction based analysis of child directed speech
Cameron‐Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2 · Cited by 592
Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax
THEAKSTON, A. L., LIEVEN, E. V. M., PINE, J. M., & ROWLAND, C. F. (2004) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000903005956 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- NAIGLES, L. R., & HOFF-GINSBERG, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-120
- ISSN
- 0305-0009
- 1469-7602
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0305000997003358
- The paper
- NAIGLES, L. R., & HOFF-GINSBERG, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000997003358