Cited by 82Legal Systems and Judicial ProcessesChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceJudicial and Constitutional Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tasselled Loafers for Barefoot Lawyers: Transformation and Tension in the World of Chinese Legal Workers

Alford, William P.·1995·The China Quarterly

Abstract

A prevalent image of China, both historically and in recent times, has been that of a civilization spared the malady of too many lawyers that is said to beset the United States and growing numbers of other nations. For better or worse, so such thinking goes, China has sought to address its problems primarily through reliance upon morality, custom, kinship or politics, rather than formal legality, with the result that there has been relatively little need for individuals whose work lies in the law. No wonder that it was Shakespeare, rather than a Chinese author, who gave voice to the much-cited, if arguably misunderstood, call to “kill all the lawyers first.”

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0305741000032896

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Fei, 1992, Queli guo cuo peichangzhi de tantao” (“Examining the establishment of a legal malpractice compensation system, Faxue (Studies in Law), 35
  2. Amsden, 1989, Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization
  3. Zhong, 1991, Lüshi shiwusuo buying chengwei yingyeshui he suodeshui de nashi zhuti” (“Law firms should not be subject to business and income taxes, Zhongguo lüshi (Chinese Lawyer), 37
  4. Kaye Lincoln , “Don't tread on us,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 24 March 1994, p. 16.
  5. Zhong, 1990, Quanguo lüshi zige zongkao bidu (Necessary Reading for the National Lawyers Qualifying Examination)
  6. Alford, 1987, When is China Paraguay?, Southern California Law Review, 61, 79
  7. Lubman, 1983, Emerging functions of formal legal institutions in China's modernization, China Law Reporter, 195
  8. Lambert Wade , “Chinese firm puts its shingle out in U.S.,” The Wall Street Journal, 2 August 1993, p. B3
  9. Epstein, 1993, The bottom line and law firm culture: men, women and the partnership problem
  10. 10.2307/1229136 · DOI
  11. Galanter, 1991, Tournament of Lawyers: The Growth and Transformation of the Big Law Firm
  12. Binyan, 1990, A Higher Kind of Loyalty: A Memoir by China's Foremost Journalist
  13. Heinz, 1982, Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar
  14. Freidson, 1986, Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge
  15. 10.2307/840344 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/2570695 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/3480382 · DOI
  18. Slind-Flor Victoria , “China's riches lure lawyers,” The National Law Journal, 29 November 1993.
  19. Gelatt, 1991, Lawyers in China: the past decade and beyond, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 751
  20. Lubman, 1970, Contemporary Chinese Law: Research Problems and Perspectives, 234
  21. Fuming, 1988, Huangpu jiang pan de jueqi: fang Li Guoji lüshi shiwusuo” (“Rising up over the Huangpu River: an interview with the Li Guoji law firm”), Lüshi yu fazhi (Lawyer and Legal System), 6
  22. Kronman, 1993, The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession
  23. Sifabu, 1993, Quanguo Lüshi youxiu anli jingxuan (Selected Outstanding Cases by Lawyers Throughout the Nation)
  24. Gordon, 1989, The independence of lawyers, Boston University Law Review, 68, 1
  25. Gui, 1991, Neimeng gaoyuan shang yi zhi duxiu” (“A brilliant star on the Inner Mongolian plateau, Lüshi yu fazhi, 41
  26. Huang, 1994, Civil Law in Qing and Republican China
  27. Nelson, 1992, Lawyers Ideals/Lawyers Practices: Transformations in the American Legal Profession, 177
  28. William Alford (ed.), Legal Aspects of International Economic Activity (unpublished course materials, Harvard Law School, 1994)
  29. Menkel-Meadow, 1989, Lawyers and Society: Comparative Theories
  30. William, 1962, Law and Sociology
  31. Alford, 1993, Essays in Honour of Wang Tieya
  32. Osiel, 1990, Lawyers as monopolists, aristocrats and entrepreneurs, Harvard Law Review, 2004
  33. Morris, 1967, Law in Imperial China
  34. David, 1968, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences
  35. Alford, 1995, To Steal a Book is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property in Chinese Civilization, 10.1515/9780804779296 · DOI
  36. Abel, 1989, American Lawyers
  37. Li, 1978, Law Without Lawyers
  38. Xiaolu Zhao , “Hezuozhi liishi shiwusuo ruogan wenti chuyi” (“Ruminations on certain questions about co-operative law firms”), Sifa xingzheng (Judicial Administration), July 1991, pp. 31–33
  39. Chen, 1992, An Introduction to the Legal System of the People's Republic of China, 133
  40. Rohwer James , “Survey: China: the Titan stirs,” The Economist, 28 November 1992, survey: pp. 1–4.
  41. Alford, 1993, Double-edged swords cut both ways: law and legitimacy in the People's Republic of China, Daedalus, 45

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Alford, W. P.
Corresponding author
Alford, William P.
Venue
The China Quarterly
Published
1995-03
Volume
141
Pages
22-38
ISSN
  • 0009-4439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0305-7410
  • 1468-2648
OpenAlex
W1966025151
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The China Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Keywords
Chinese lawyers, legal profession, legal culture, formal legality, kinship, politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review