The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Chinese Energy Security Debate
Abstract
China's shift to a net oil importer has generated much speculation outside China about how China's growing dependence on foreign oil will affect its international behaviour. This discussion is framed by two competing models of China's future approach to energy security: one that foresees deeper integration into global energy markets and another that predicts efforts to minimize reliance on these markets in potentially destabilizing ways. Less attention has been paid, however, to the parallel debate unfolding inside China over how to ensure the country's oil needs are met without undermining national security. This article introduces the main participants in the debate, how the debate relates to energy security decision-making, and some of the measures to enhance energy security under consideration. It concludes with a discussion of some of the factors that will shape China's emerging approach to energy security.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
China's engagement in Africa: scope, significance and consequences
Tull, D. M. (2006) · The Journal of Modern African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0022278x06001856 · Cited by 580
A critical review of China’s rapidly developing renewable energy and energy efficiency policies
Lo, K. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.006 · Cited by 318
Shen, S. (2009) · The Journal of Modern African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0022278x09003991 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Downs, E. S.
- Venue
- The China Quarterly
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 177
- Pages
- 21-41
- ISSN
- 0009-4439 (ISSN-L)
- 0305-7410
- 1468-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2166379484
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 96.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Chinese Energy Security Debate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0305741004000037
- The paper
- Downs, E. S. (2004). The Chinese Energy Security Debate. The China Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741004000037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.