Cited by 96Information and Cyber SecurityMaritime Navigation and SafetyNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Maritime Cyber Risk Management: An Experimental Ship Assessment

Svilicic, Boris, Kamahara, Junzo, Rooks, Matthew, Yano, Yoshiji·2019·Journal of Navigation

Abstract

The maritime transport industry is increasingly reliant on computing and communication technologies, and the need for cyber risk management of critical systems and assets on vessels is becoming critically important. In this paper, a comprehensive cyber risk assessment of a ship is presented. An experimental process consisting of assessment preparation activities, assessment conduct and results communication has been developed. The assessment conduct relies on a survey developed and performed by interviewing a ship's crew. Computational vulnerability scanning of the ship's Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) is introduced as a specific part of this cyber security assessment. The assessment process presented has been experimentally tested by evaluating the cyber security level of Kobe University's training ship Fukae-maru. For computational vulnerability scanning, an industry-leading software tool has been used, and a quantitative cyber risk analysis has been conducted to evaluate cyber risks on the ship.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0373463318001157

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1145/2664243.2664257 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s13437-018-0136-5 · DOI
  3. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2013). International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. SOLAS/CONF.5/34. International Maritime Organization.
  4. Shapiro, 2018, Trojan horse risks in the maritime transportation systems sector, Journal of Transportation Security, 8, 1
  5. 10.1016/j.csi.2017.09.006 · DOI
  6. Svilicic, 2005, Computer Systems Privacy Protection, Journal of Maritime Research Pomorstvo, 19, 275
  7. 10.21278/brod68106 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/CyberSA.2016.7503295 · DOI
  9. 10.1115/OMAE2017-61771 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0373463318000164 · DOI
  11. 10.5916/jkosme.2017.41.8.738 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 96

Metadata

Authors
Svilicic, B., Kamahara, J., Rooks, M., & Yano, Y.
Affiliations
Kobe University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Navigation
Published
2019-02-07
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
1108-1120
ISSN
  • 0373-4633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7785
OpenAlex
W2913327161
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Navigation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Maritime Navigation and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
cybersecurity risk assessment, ECDIS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review