The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maritime Cyber Risk Management: An Experimental Ship Assessment
Abstract
The maritime transport industry is increasingly reliant on computing and communication technologies, and the need for cyber risk management of critical systems and assets on vessels is becoming critically important. In this paper, a comprehensive cyber risk assessment of a ship is presented. An experimental process consisting of assessment preparation activities, assessment conduct and results communication has been developed. The assessment conduct relies on a survey developed and performed by interviewing a ship's crew. Computational vulnerability scanning of the ship's Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) is introduced as a specific part of this cyber security assessment. The assessment process presented has been experimentally tested by evaluating the cyber security level of Kobe University's training ship Fukae-maru. For computational vulnerability scanning, an industry-leading software tool has been used, and a quantitative cyber risk analysis has been conducted to evaluate cyber risks on the ship.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the maritime industry, such cyber threat commonly attacks remote desktop protocol (RDP) services running on the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) (Svilicic et al., 2019).”
From A BN driven FMEA approach to assess maritime cybersecurity risks (2023) · cites this paper as Svilicic et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1145/2664243.2664257 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13437-018-0136-5 · DOI
- International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2013). International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. SOLAS/CONF.5/34. International Maritime Organization.
- Shapiro, 2018, Trojan horse risks in the maritime transportation systems sector, Journal of Transportation Security, 8, 1
- 10.1016/j.csi.2017.09.006 · DOI
- Svilicic, 2005, Computer Systems Privacy Protection, Journal of Maritime Research Pomorstvo, 19, 275
- 10.21278/brod68106 · DOI
- 10.1109/CyberSA.2016.7503295 · DOI
- 10.1115/OMAE2017-61771 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0373463318000164 · DOI
- 10.5916/jkosme.2017.41.8.738 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A BN driven FMEA approach to assess maritime cybersecurity risks
Park, C., Kontovas, C., Yang, Z., & Chang, C.-H. (2023) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106480 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Svilicic, B., Kamahara, J., Rooks, M., & Yano, Y.
- Affiliations
- Kobe University (JP)
- Venue
- Journal of Navigation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-02-07
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1108-1120
- ISSN
- 0373-4633 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7785
- OpenAlex
- W2913327161
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Navigation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Maritime Navigation and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- cybersecurity risk assessment, ECDIS
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review