Cited by 702Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementOil Palm Production and Sustainability

Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil

Fearnside, Philip M.·2001·Environmental Conservation

Abstract

Soybeans represent a recent and powerful threat to tropical biodiversity in Brazil. Developing effective strategies to contain and minimize the environmental impact of soybean cultivation requires understanding of both the forces that drive the soybean advance and the many ways that soybeans and their associated infrastructure catalyse destructive processes. The present paper presents an up-to-date review of the advance of soybeans in Brazil, its environmental and social costs and implications for development policy. Soybeans are driven by global market forces, making them different from many of the land-use changes that have dominated the scene in Brazil so far, particularly in Amazonia. Soybeans are much more damaging than other crops because they justify massive transportation infrastructure projects that unleash a chain of events leading to destruction of natural habitats over wide areas in addition to what is directly cultivated for soybeans. The capacity of global markets to absorb additional production represents the most likely limit to the spread of soybeans, although Brazil may someday come to see the need for discouraging rather than subsidizing this crop because many of its effects are unfavourable to national interests, including severe concentration of land tenure and income, expulsion of population to Amazonian frontier, and gold-mining, as well as urban areas, and the opportunity cost of substantial drains on government resources. The multiple impacts of soybean expansion on biodiversity and other development considerations have several implications for policy: (1) protected areas need to be created in advance of soybean frontiers, (2) elimination of the many subsidies that speed soybean expansion beyond what would occur otherwise from market forces is to be encouraged, (3) studies to assess the costs of social and environmental impacts associated with soybean expansion are urgently required, and (4) the environmental-impact regulatory system requires strengthening, including mechanisms for commitments not to implant specific infrastructure projects that are judged to have excessive impacts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0376892901000030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fearnside, P. M.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
Corresponding author
Fearnside, Philip M.
Venue
Environmental Conservation
Published
2001-03
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
23-38
ISSN
  • 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4387
OpenAlex
W2110516276
Cited by
702
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 37
FWCI
55.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
Keywords
soybean cultivation, land use change, Amazon basin, transport infrastructure, habitat loss, agricultural expansion, international commodity markets, agricultural subsidies, gold mining, protected areas, development policy, Brazil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review