The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research Notes: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): Background, Rationale, Methods
Abstract
Relatively little is known about the factors in Canada which lead to osteoporosis and its concomitant fractures. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) is a prospective cohort study which will estimate the incidence and prevalence of declining bone mass and fractures. The impact of osteoporosis in Canada will be assessed, including regional variation and the effect of various risk factors. The study will provide information for developing prevention programs. The cohort has been drawn from a random population-based sample of non-institutionalized men and women 25 years old or more and living within 50 km. of nine cities in Canada. Through telephone interviews 9,423 participants have been recruited. All answered an extensive questionnaire, and had physical measurements related to bone quality taken. This paper details the CaMos baseline and five-year follow-up protocol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Cited by
Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: A meta-analysis
De Laet, C., Kanis, J. A., Odén, A., Johanson, H., Johnell, O., Delmas, P., Eisman, J. A., Kroger, H., Fujiwara, S., Garnero, P., et al. (2005) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-005-1863-y · Cited by 1,622
Self-citationPredictive Value of BMD for Hip and Other Fractures
Johnell, O., Kanis, J. A., Oden, A., Johansson, H., De Laet, C., Delmas, P., Eisman, J. A., Fujiwara, S., Kroger, H., Mellstrom, D., et al. (2005) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.050304 · Cited by 1,445
Self-citationA meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk
Kanis, J. A., Johnell, O., De Laet, C., Johansson, H., Oden, A., Delmas, P., Eisman, J., Fujiwara, S., Garnero, P., Kroger, H., et al. (2004) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024 · Cited by 1,278
Self-citationThe development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome
GROLL, D., TO, T., BOMBARDIER, C., & WRIGHT, J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.018 · Cited by 1,198
Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis
Kanis, J. A., Johnell, O., Oden, A., Johansson, H., De Laet, C., Eisman, J. A., Fujiwara, S., Kroger, H., McCloskey, E. V., Mellstrom, D., et al. (2005) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1640-3 · Cited by 999
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreiger, N., Tenenhouse, A., Joseph, L., Mackenzie, T., Poliquin, S., Brown, J. P., Prior, J. C., & Rittmaster, R. S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-387
- ISSN
- 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
- 1710-1107
- OpenAlex
- W2139353161
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research Notes: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): Background, Rationale, Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0714980800009934
- The paper
- Kreiger, N., Tenenhouse, A., Joseph, L., Mackenzie, T., Poliquin, S., Brown, J. P., Prior, J. C., & Rittmaster, R. S. (1999). Research Notes: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): Background, Rationale, Methods. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980800009934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
