Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: Soil microorganisms

Visser, Suzanne, Parkinson, Dennis·1992·American Journal of Alternative Agriculture

Abstract

Diverse soil microbiological studies have attempted to assess deterioration or improvement in soil quality. These studies have been done on three levels: population level studies of the dynamics of species that are presumed to be important or sensitive; community level studies of microbial community structure, such as species diversity and frequency of occurence of species; and ecosystem level studies of a range of soil processes. We suggest that ecosystem level approaches offer the best possibilities for rapidly assessing changes in soil quality. Data from such studies will allow researchers to decide whether to proceed with population or community level studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0889189300004434

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1139/b88-265 · DOI
  2. Wicklow, 1981, The Fungal Community: Its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem
  3. 10.1007/BF02220768 · DOI
  4. Visser, 1988, Redevelopment of biological activity in stripmine spoils: Saprotrophic fungi (Abstract), Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 94B, 85
  5. Skujins, 1978, Soil Enzymes, 1
  6. 10.1016/0167-8809(91)90090-K · DOI · Paper page
  7. Waksman, 1927, Principles of Soil Microbiology, 10.2307/3221963 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/BF00541913 · doi:10.1007/bf00541913
  9. 10.2307/1310021 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.164.3877.262 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/BF02011711 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Harrison, 1990, Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Field Methods, Applications and Interpretation
  13. Page, 1982, Chemical and MicrobiologicalProperties
  14. Domsch, 1983, An ecological concept for the assessment of side-effects of agrochemicals on soil microorganisms, Residue Reviews, 86, 65
  15. Domsch, 1960, Die Wirkung von Bodenfungiciden. IV. Veränderungen in Specktrum der Bodenpilze, Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 67, 129
  16. Burns, 1982, Experimental Microbial Ecology
  17. 10.1002/jpln.19861490409 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/jpln.19560730102 · DOI
  19. Domsch, 1980, Compendium of Soil Fungi, 1
  20. 27. Somerville L. , Greaves M.P. , Domsch K.H. , Verstraete V. , Poole N. J. , van Dijk H. , and Anderson J.P.E. . 1987. Recommended laboratory tests for assessing the side-effects of pesticides on the soil microflora. Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop, Cambridge, 03 1985, pp. 29.
  21. Klein, 1985, Soil Reclamation Processes: Microbiological Analyses and Applications, 141
  22. 10.1139/x89-147 · doi:10.1139/x89-147
  23. Swift, 1976, The Role of Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms in Decomposition Processes, 185
  24. 10.1016/0038-0717(89)90097-7 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Anderson, 1982, Methods of Soil Analysis, 837
  26. Waksman, 1924, Microbiological analysis of soil as an index of soil fertility, Carbon dioxide evolution. Soil Sci., 17, 141
  27. Swift, 1979, Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 10.1525/9780520407114 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0038-0717(78)90099-8 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Paul, 1989, Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, 10.1016/B978-0-12-546805-3.50004-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1002/jpln.19841470403 · doi:10.1002/jpln.19841470403
  31. 10.1007/BF00541914 · doi:10.1007/bf00541914
  32. 10.1007/BF00388474 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 38. Zak J.C. , Fresquez P.R. , and Visser S. , (in press). Soil microbial processes and dynamics: Their importance to effective reclamation. In J. Chambers and G.L. Waide (eds). Evaluating Reclamation Success. General Technical Report. N.E. Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agric.
  34. Domsch, 1970, Pilze aus Agrarböden
  35. 10.1007/BF01398924 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Bengtsson, 1988, Soil Biological Variables in Environmental Hazard Assessment, 60

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Visser, S., & Parkinson, D.
Venue
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
Published
1992-06
Volume
7
Issue
1-2
Pages
33-37
ISSN
  • 0889-1893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5498
OpenAlex
W2122131749
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: Soil microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0889189300004434
The paper
Visser, S., & Parkinson, D. (1992). Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: Soil microorganisms. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0889189300004434

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.