CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 341Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesInternational Law and Human RightsEvolving Legal Systems and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures

Open access
PETERS, ANNE·2006·Leiden Journal of International Law
DOI 10.1017/s0922156506003487
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The article conceives international (or global) constitutionalism as a legal argument which recommends and strengthens efforts (legal and political) to compensate for ongoing de-constitutionalization on the domestic level. Although the notions ‘international constitution’ and ‘international constitutionalism’ have in recent years served as buzzwords in various discourses, the many meanings of those concepts have not yet been fully explored and disentangled. This paper suggests a specific understanding of those concepts. It highlights various aspects and elements of micro- and macro-constitutionalization in international law, and identifies anti-constitutionalist trends. On this basis, the paper finds that, although no international constitution in a formal sense exists, fundamental norms in the international legal order do fulfil constitutional functions. Because those norms can reasonably be qualified as having a constitutional quality, they may not be summarily discarded in the event of a conflict with domestic constitutional law. Because the relevant norms form a transnational constitutional network, and cannot be aligned in an abstract hierarchy, conflict resolution requires a balancing of interests in concrete cases. Finally, because constitutionalism historically and prescriptively means asking for a legitimate constitution, a constitutionalist reading of the international legal order provokes the question of its legitimacy. This question is pressing, because state sovereignty and consent are – on good grounds – no longer accepted as the sole source of legitimacy of international law. International constitutionalism – as understood in this paper – does not ask for state-like forms of legitimacy of a world government, but stimulates the search for new mechanisms to strengthen the legitimacy of global governance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0922156506003487

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–341 of 341

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
PETERS, A.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (DE)
Corresponding author
PETERS, ANNE
ORCID
PETERS, ANNE
Venue
Leiden Journal of International Law
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2006-10
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
579-610
ISSN
  • 0922-1565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9698
DOI
10.1017/s0922156506003487
OpenAlex
W2125278925
Cited by
324
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
48.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 3811 d)
Locations
  • Leiden Journal of International Law (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Law › Evolving Legal Systems and Governance
Keywords
international constitutionalism, constitutionalization of international law, anti-constitutionalism, conflict between international and domestic law, legitimacy of international law, global governance, state sovereignty, consent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review