Cited by 598SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchRespiratory viral infections researchAnimal Virus Infections Studies

The time course of the immune response to experimental coronavirus infection of man

Open access
Callow, K. A., Parry, H. F., Sergeant, M., Tyrrell, D. A. J.·1990·Epidemiology and Infection

Abstract

SUMMARY: After preliminary trials, the detailed changes in the concentration of specific circulating and local antibodies were followed in 15 volunteers inoculated with coronavirus 229E. Ten of them, who had significantly lower concentrations of pre-existing antibody than the rest, became infected and eight of these developed colds. A limited investigation of circulating lymphocyte populations showed some lymphocytopenia in infected volunteers. In this group, antibody concentrations started to increase 1 week after inoculation and reached a maximum about 1 week later. Thereafter antibody titres slowly declined. Although concentrations were still slightly raised 1 year later, this did not always prevent reinfection when volunteers were then challenged with the homologous virus. However, the period of virus shedding was shorter than before and none developed a cold. All of the uninfected group were infected on re-challenge although they also appeared to show some resistance to disease and in the extent of infection. These results are discussed with reference to natural infections with coronavirus and with other infections, such as rhinovirus infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0950268800048019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experience from other human coronaviruses has indicated the possibility of re-infection because of a waning antibody response.

    “Experience from other human coronaviruses has indicated the possibility of re-infection because of a waning antibody response (Callow et al., 1990; Wu et al., 2007).”

    From A thermostable mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as Callow et al., 1990

  • Most adults have probably had multiple hCoV exposures, and after an hCoV infection people can become reinfection-susceptible within 12-18 months.

    “By adulthood, most individuals are likely to have been exposed multiple times, with longitudinal studies and human challenge studies suggesting that individuals become susceptible to reinfection within 12–18 months after a previous hCoV infection74–78.”
  • Other scenarios are plausible: vaccine protection may be brief, or it may prevent severe disease without stopping spread.

    “alternative scenarios are also possible in which vaccine efficacy is either short lived or provides protection from severe disease but does not block transmission74–78.”
  • Controlled infection studies with endemic coronaviruses found that nasal IgA levels correlate with protection.

    “Historical studies of controlled human infection with endemic coronaviruses indicated that levels of nasal IgA correlate with protection against these infections35,36.”
  • The HCoV challenge studies provide evidence for immune memory that at least provided protection from clinical symptoms and reduced viral shedding, and this provides support for the potential efficacy of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

    “Thus, the studies provide evidence for immune memory that at least provided protection from clinical symptoms and reduced viral shedding; this also provides support for the potential efficacy of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.”

    From Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Callow et al., 1990

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 598

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Cate TR, Rossen RD, Gordon Douglas R Jr, Butler WT, Couch RB. The role of nasal secretion and serum antibody in the rhinovirus common cold. Am J Epidemiol 1966; 84: 352-63.
  2. Butler WT, Waldmann TA, Rossen RD, Gordon Douglas R Jr, Couch RB. Changes in IgA and IgG concentrations in nasal secretions prior to the appearance of antibody during viral respiratory infection in man. J Immunol 1970; 105: 584-91.
  3. Alford RH, Rossen RD, Butler WT, Kasel JA. Neutralizing and hemagglutination- inhibiting activity of nasal secretions following experimental human infection with A2 influenza virus. J Immunol 1967; 98: 4724-31.
  4. Rossen RD, Butler WT, Waldmann RH, et al. The proteins in nasal secretion. II A longitudinal study of IgA and neutralizing antibody levels in nasal washings from men infected with influenza virus. JAMA 1970; 211: 1157-61.
  5. Yanagihara R, Mclntosh K. Secretory immunological response in infants and children to parainfluenza virus types 1 and 2. Infect Immun 1980; 30: 23-8.
  6. Crifo S, Vella S, Filiaci F, Resta S, Rocchi G. Secretory immune response after nasal vaccination with live attenuated influenza virus. Rhinology 1980; 18: 87-92.
  7. Buscho RF, Perkins JC, Knopf HLS, Kapikian AZ. Chanock RM. Further characterisation of the local respiratory tract antibody response induced by intranasal instillation of inactivated rhinovirus 13 vaccine. J Immunol 1972; 108: 169-76.
  8. Taylor-Robinson D. Studies on some viruses (rhinoviruses) isolated from common colds. Arch ges Virusforsch 1963; 13: 281-93.
  9. Barclay WS, Al-Nakib W, Higgins PG, Tyrrell DAJ. The time course of the humoral immune response to rhinovirus infection. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 103: 659-69.
  10. Callow KA. Effect of specific humoral immunity and some non-specific factors on resistance of volunteers to respiratory coronavirus infection. J Hyg 1985; 95: 173-89.
  11. Macnaughton MR. Occurrence and frequency of coronavirus infections in humans as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infect Immun 1982; 38: 419-23.
  12. Reed SE. The behaviour of recent isolates of human respiratory coronavirus in vitro and in volunteers. J Med Virol 1984; 13: 179-93.
  13. Levandowski RA, Ou DW, Jackson GG. Acute-phase decrease of T lymphocyte subsets in rhinovirus infection. J Infect Dis 1986; 153: 743-8.
  14. Scheinberg MA, Blacklow NR, Goldstein AL, Parrino TA, Rose FB, Cathcart ES. Influenza: response of T-cell lymphopenia to thymosin. New Engl J Med 1976; 294: 1208-11.
  15. Dolin R, Richman DD, Murphy BR, Fauci AS. Cell-mediated immune responses in humans after induced infection with influenza A virus. J Infect Dis 1977; 135: 714-9.
  16. Faguet GB. The effect of killed influenza virus vaccine on the kinetics of normal human lymphocytes. J Infect Dis 1981; 143: 252-8.
  17. Aoki FY, Stiver HG, Sitar DS, et al. Potential of influenza vaccine and amantadine to prevent influenza A illness in Canadian Forces Personnel 1980-1983. Milit Med 1986; 151: 459-65.
  18. Beare AS, Reed SE. The study of antiviral compounds in volunteers. In: Oxford JS, ed. Chemoprophylaxis and virus infections of the respiratory tract vol II. Cleveland: CRC Press, 1977; 27-55.
  19. Higgins PG, Phillpotts RJ, Scott GM, Wallace J, Bernhardt LL, Tyrrell DAJ. Intranasal interferon as protection against experimental respiratory coronavirus infection in volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1983; 24: 713-5.
  20. Barclay WS, Callow KA, Sergeant M, Al-Nakib W. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that measures rhinovirus-specific antibodies in human sera and nasal secretions. J Med Virol 1988; 25: 475-82.
  21. Phillpotts RJ. Clones of MRC-C cells may be superior to the parent line for the culture of 229E-like strains of human respiratory coronavirus. J Virol Methods 1983; 6: 267-9.
  22. Holmes MJ, Callow KA, Parry HF. An improved method for recovery of secretory immunoglobulins and lymphocytes from the nasal mucosa. Immunol Methods 1987; 48: 183-7.
  23. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265-75.
  24. Totman R, Kiff J, Reed SE, Craig JW 1980. Predicting experimental colds in volunteers from different measures of recent life stress. J Psychosom Res 1980; 24: 155-63.
  25. Broadbent DE, Broadbent MHP, Phillpotts RJ, Wallace J. Some further studies on the prediction of experimental colds in volunteers by psychological factors. J Psychosom Res 1984; 28: 511-23.
  26. Larson HE, Reed SE, T3 7 rrell DAJ. Isolation of rhinoviruses and coronaviruses from 38 colds in adults. J Med Virol 1980; 5: 221-9.
  27. Lidwell OM, Williams REO. The epidemiology of the common cold I. J Hyg 1961; 59: 309-19.
  28. Cavallaro JJ, Monto AS. Community-wide outbreak of infection with a 229E-like coronavirus in Tecumseh Michigan. J Infect Dis 1970; 122: 272-9.
  29. Kaye HS, Marsh HB, Dowdle WR. Seroepidemiologic survey of coronavirus strain OC43 related infections in a children's population. Am J Epidemiol 1971; 94: 43-9.
  30. Monto AS. Medical reviews: Coronaviruses. Yale J Biol Med 1974; 47: 234-51.

Authors
Callow, K. A., Parry, H. F., Sergeant, M., & Tyrrell, D. A. J.
Affiliations
  • Salisbury District Hospital (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Epidemiology and Infection
Published
1990-10
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
435-446
ISSN
  • 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4409
OpenAlex
W1979065938
Cited by
598
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 194 · 2020: 195 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
HCoV-229E, experimental infection, humoral immune response, antibody titers, antibody persistence, reinfection, lymphopenia, cold, viral shedding, pre-existing antibodies, rhinovirus infection
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Viral, Coronaviridae, Coronaviridae Infections, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Immunoglobulin A, Secretory, Immunoglobulin G, Kinetics, Leukocyte Count, Lymphocytes, Nasal Mucosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review