The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. at two Dutch broiler farms
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Broiler flocks on two Dutch poultry farms were screened weekly for the presence of Campylobacter in fresh caecal droppings during eight consecutive production cycles. Hatchery and fresh litter samples were taken at the start of each new cycle. Water, feed, insects, and faeces of domestic animals, present on the farms were also included in the sampling. Penner seretyping of isolates was used to identify epidemiological factors that contribute to Campylobacter colonization in the broiler flocks. Generally, broiler flocks became colonized with Campylobacter at about 3–4 weeks of age with isolation percentages of 100%, and stayed colonized up to slaughter. A similar pattern of serotypes was found within the various broiler houses on one farm during one production cycle. New flocks generally showed also a new pattern of serotypes. Most serotypes isolated from the laying hens, pigs, sheep and cattle were different from those isolated from the broilers at the same time. Campylobacter serotypes from darkling beetles inside the broiler houses were identical to the ones isolated from the broilers. No Campylobacter was isolated from any of the hatchery, water, feed or fresh litter samples. Conclusive evidence of transmission routes was not found, but results certainly point towards horizontal transmission from the environment. Horizontal transmission from one broiler flock to the next one via a persistent contamination within the broiler house, as well as vertical transmission from breeder flocks via the hatchery to progeny, did not seem to be very likely.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Buswell, C. M., Herlihy, Y. M., Lawrence, L. M., McGuiggan, J. T. M., Marsh, P. D., Keevil, C. W., & Leach, S. A. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.2.733-741.1998 · Cited by 339
Knowledge gaps in control of Campylobacter for prevention of campylobacteriosis
Hansson, I., Sandberg, M., Habib, I., Lowman, R., & Engvall, E. O. (2018) · Transboundary and Emerging Diseases · doi:10.1111/tbed.12870 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobs-Reitsma, W. F., Van de Giessen, A. W., Bolder, N. M., & Mulder, R. W. A. W.
- Venue
- Epidemiology and Infection
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 413-421
- ISSN
- 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4409
- OpenAlex
- W2163476348
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. at two Dutch broiler farms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0950268800052122
- The paper
- Jacobs-Reitsma, W. F., Van de Giessen, A. W., Bolder, N. M., & Mulder, R. W. A. W. (1995). Epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. at two Dutch broiler farms. Epidemiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268800052122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.