The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine status in adults based on self-report
Open accessAbstract
Self-report of polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccination is not thought reliable because of the increased risk of adverse events from inadvertent re-vaccination in elderly people. Some studies suggest a high sensitivity of self-report and hence a low risk of adverse events if vaccination is administered when medical records are unavailable. Self-report of pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in a sample of >64-year-olds in the United Kingdom was compared with information in their medical records. Self-report of pneumococcal vaccination, in contrast to some of the other studies had a low sensitivity. The findings here support the need for accurate knowledge of prior vaccine status before offering the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine. The study also confirms that self-report of influenza vaccination could be relied upon if rapid knowledge of uptake is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice
Hassey, A., Gerrett, D., & Wilson, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1401 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Surveillance of vaccination coverage among adult populations—United States, 2015.
Williams, W. W., Lu, P.-J., O’Halloran, A., Kim, D. K., Grohskopf, L. A., Pilishvili, T., Skoff, T. H., Nelson, N. P., Harpaz, R., Markowitz, L. E., et al. (2017) · MMWR Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6611a1 · Cited by 442
Sullivan, S. G., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., & Cowling, B. J. (2016) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kww064 · Cited by 319
Rolnick, S. J., Parker, E. D., Nordin, J. D., Hedblom, B. D., Wei, F., Kerby, T., Jackson, J. M., Crain, A. L., & Euler, G. (2013) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.041 · Cited by 259
Webster, F., Gidding, H., Matthews, V., Taylor, R., & Menzies, R. (2019) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12944 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- MANGTANI, P., SHAH, A., & ROBERTS, J. A.
- Venue
- Epidemiology and Infection
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-02
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-143
- ISSN
- 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4409
- OpenAlex
- W2094294759
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine status in adults based on self-report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0950268806006479
- The paper
- MANGTANI, P., SHAH, A., & ROBERTS, J. A. (2007). Validation of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine status in adults based on self-report. Epidemiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268806006479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
