Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,802

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intonational structure in Japanese and English

Beckman, Mary E., Pierrehumbert, Janet B.·1986·Phonology Yearbook

Abstract

Comparisons between Japanese and English prosodics have usually either focused on the strikingly apparent phonetic differences between the stress patterns of English and the tonal accent patterns of Japanese or concentrated upon formal similarities between the abstract arrangements of the stresses and tones. A recent investigation of tone structure in Japanese (Pierrehumbert & Beckman forthcoming), however, has convinced us that if the proper prosodic phenomena are compared, far more pervasive similarities can be discovered and of a much more concrete sort than hitherto suspected. In particular, there is now extensive evidence that Japanese tonal patterns are very sparsely specified, which suggests that they are much more similar to English intonational structures than earlier descriptions would have allowed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s095267570000066x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Pierrehumbert, 1983, Prosody: Normal and Abnormal
  2. 10.1121/1.383670 · doi:10.1121/1.383670
  3. Liberman , Mark Y. (1975). The intonational system of English. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  4. Clark Mary (1978). A dynamic treatment of tone with special attention to the tonal system of Igbo. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  5. Bing , Janet D. (1979). Aspects of English prosody. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  6. 10.1121/1.1908095 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bolinger, 1965, Forms of English: accent, morpheme, order, 139
  8. Umeda, 1982, Fo declination is situation dependent, JPh, 10, 279
  9. 10.1515/9783110859263 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Liberman, 1984, Language sound structure, 157
  11. 10.1121/1.381719 · DOI
  12. Lea, 1977, Acoustic correlates of stress and juncture, Studies in stress and accent, 4, 83
  13. Pulleyblank , Douglas (1983). Tone in Lexical Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  14. Kawakami, 1956, Buntoo no intoneesyon, Kokugogaku, 25, 21
  15. 10.1121/1.384069 · doi:10.1121/1.384069
  16. 10.1177/002383095800100207 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Selkirk, 1984, Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure
  18. Brown, 1980, Questions of intonation
  19. Liberman, 1977, On stress and linguistic rhythm, LI, 8, 249
  20. Boyce S. & L. Menn (1979). Peaks vary, endpoints don't: implications for linguistic theory. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 373–384.
  21. 10.1159/000259924 · doi:10.1159/000259924
  22. 10.1109/ICASSP.1984.1172427 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1984.1172427
  23. Kawakami, 1961, On the relationship between word-tone and phrase-tone in Japanese language, Onsei no kenkyuu, 9, 169
  24. Kubozono, 1985, On the syntax and prosody of Japanese compounds, Work in Progress, 18, 60
  25. 10.1121/1.2022308 · doi:10.1121/1.2022308
  26. O'Connor, 1961, Intonation of colloquial English
  27. Hirschberg Julia & Janet Pierrehumbert (1986). Intonational structuring of discourse. Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, New York. 136–144.
  28. 10.1515/9783110874020 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lieberman, 1967, Intonation, perception and language
  30. Ladd, 1983, Phonological features of intonational peaks, Lg, 59, 721
  31. 10.1145/22627.22344 · DOI
  32. McCawley, 1968, The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese
  33. Prince, 1983, Relating to the grid, LI, 14, 19
  34. Crystal, 1969, Prosodic systems and intonation in English
  35. Nolan, 1984, Auditory and instrumental analysis of intonation, Cambridge Papers in Phonetics and Experimental Linguistics, 3
  36. Halle, 1985, Phonologie Pluri-linéaire
  37. Pierrehumbert , Janet B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  38. Poser , William J. (1984). The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  39. Haraguchi, 1977, The tone pattern of Japanese: an autosegmental theory of tonology

Cited by

See all 1,802

Metadata

Authors
Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B.
Venue
Phonology Yearbook
Published
1986-05
Volume
3
Pages
255-309
ISSN
  • 0265-8062 (ISSN-L)
  • 2059-6286
OpenAlex
W2115316195
Cited by
1,802
References
0
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intonational structure in Japanese and English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s095267570000066x
The paper
Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095267570000066x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.