Cited by 45Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis

Taxonomy of Penicillium chrysogenum and related xerophilic species, based on isozyme analysis

Banke, Søren, Frisvad, Jens C., Rosendahl, Søren·1997·Mycological Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0953756296003048

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banke, S., Frisvad, J. C., & Rosendahl, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Venue
Mycological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-05
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
617-624
ISSN
0953-7562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963643228
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mycological Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Keywords
Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium nalgiovense, xerophilic fungi, fungal taxonomy, new species description, isozyme polymorphism, genetic distance, species delimitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review