Cited by 194Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Emotion recognition in autism: verbal and nonverbal information

LOVELAND, KATHERINE A., TUNALI–KOTOSKI, BELGIN, CHEN, Y. RICHARD, ORTEGON, JULIANA, PEARSON, DEBORAH A., BRELSFORD, KRISTIN A., GIBBS, M. CULLEN·1997·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

This study examined the roles of verbal and nonverbal sources of information in the ability of persons with and without autism to recognize emotion. Child, adolescent, and young adult participants in four groups [Lower Functioning Autism (LFA) (n = 17), High Functioning Autism (HFA) (n = 18), Lower Functioning Comparison (LFC) (n = 18), and High Functioning Comparison (HFC) (n = 23)] identified emotions shown (happy, angry, sad, surprised, or neutral) in video clips of individuals expressing emotion verbally, nonverbally, or both. Verbal expressions of emotion were either Explicit, Implicit, or Neutral, whereas nonverbal expressions were Animate or Flat (3 × 2). Pairwise ANCOVAs indicated no group differences between HFA and HFC groups or between the LFA and LFC groups, and indicated instead group differences between higher and lower functioning persons. With groups collapsed into High Functioning (HF) and Lower Functioning (LF), significant group differences were found. Performance of LF individuals suggested they had difficulty inferring how a person felt based on what the person said, if the emotion was not explicitly named. Performance of HF individuals suggested they relied more on nonverbal than on verbal information to determine a speaker's emotion, except where the emotion was explicitly named. Results suggested that persons with autistic spectrum disorders can use affective information from multiple sources in much the same ways as persons of comparable developmental level without autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579497001351

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 194

Authors
LOVELAND, K. A., TUNALI–KOTOSKI, B., CHEN, Y. R., ORTEGON, J., PEARSON, D. A., BRELSFORD, K. A., & GIBBS, M. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas System (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
1997-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
579-593
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2116098174
Cited by
194
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000357-09)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (5 R01 DC 00357-09)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
emotion recognition, autism spectrum disorder, facial expressions, social cognition, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Autistic Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review