Emotion recognition in autism: verbal and nonverbal information
Abstract
This study examined the roles of verbal and nonverbal sources of information in the ability of persons with and without autism to recognize emotion. Child, adolescent, and young adult participants in four groups [Lower Functioning Autism (LFA) (n = 17), High Functioning Autism (HFA) (n = 18), Lower Functioning Comparison (LFC) (n = 18), and High Functioning Comparison (HFC) (n = 23)] identified emotions shown (happy, angry, sad, surprised, or neutral) in video clips of individuals expressing emotion verbally, nonverbally, or both. Verbal expressions of emotion were either Explicit, Implicit, or Neutral, whereas nonverbal expressions were Animate or Flat (3 × 2). Pairwise ANCOVAs indicated no group differences between HFA and HFC groups or between the LFA and LFC groups, and indicated instead group differences between higher and lower functioning persons. With groups collapsed into High Functioning (HF) and Lower Functioning (LF), significant group differences were found. Performance of LF individuals suggested they had difficulty inferring how a person felt based on what the person said, if the emotion was not explicitly named. Performance of HF individuals suggested they relied more on nonverbal than on verbal information to determine a speaker's emotion, except where the emotion was explicitly named. Results suggested that persons with autistic spectrum disorders can use affective information from multiple sources in much the same ways as persons of comparable developmental level without autism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Impaired social cognition is a well-established core deficit specific to ASD.
“In contrast, impaired social cognition is a substantially affirmed prime deficit specific for ASD.46”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 194
- Authors
- LOVELAND, K. A., TUNALI–KOTOSKI, B., CHEN, Y. R., ORTEGON, J., PEARSON, D. A., BRELSFORD, K. A., & GIBBS, M. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas System (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 579-593
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W2116098174
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000357-09)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (5 R01 DC 00357-09)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- emotion recognition, autism spectrum disorder, facial expressions, social cognition, children and adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Autistic Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review