The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective
Abstract
While the concepts and principles associated with learner autonomy underpin a broad range of CALL applications and research projects, current debates and research paradigms in CALL do not provide adequate tools and models to investigate in depth the relationship between CALL and the development of learner autonomy. This paper explores the potential of cultural-historical activity theory to study this relationship. Starting from the complex and multidimensional nature of learner autonomy, it highlights some of the weaknesses in the CALL literature addressing some aspects of this relationship. Following a presentation of the main tenets of cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT), including the notion of contradiction which is at the core of CHAT, it then seeks to demonstrate how activity theory can assist us in rethinking our understanding of learner autonomy in the context of technology-rich language learning environments and in formulating suitable criteria and questions, which can guide judgemental and empirical analyses. The paper concludes by illustrating some of the principles explored through examples drawn from an activity-theoretical judgemental analysis of a French module delivered to first year students in Dublin City University.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“AT can help illuminate challenges related to cultures of use of tools (see Thorne, 2003) occurring when students 'approach [a] new task with old habits' (Blin, 2004, p. 167).”
From Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology (2008) · cites this paper as Blin, 2004
In the citing paper
“AT has also been applied to studies of learners.”
From Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology (2008) · cites this paper as Blin, 2004
Citations
Cites
Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research
Engeström, Y. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139814744 · Cited by 4,991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1203 · Cited by 213
“…as disturbances, which are visible manifestations of contradictions (Capper & Williams, 2004) or “unintentional deviations from the script [which] cause discoordinations in interaction” and “deviations in the observable flow of interaction” (Engeström, Brown, Christopher, & Gregory, 1991, p. 91).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- BLIN, F.
- Affiliations
- Dublin City University (IE)
- Corresponding author
- BLIN, FRANÇOISE
- ORCID
- BLIN, FRANÇOISE
- Venue
- ReCALL
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 377-395
- ISSN
- 0958-3440 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0109
- OpenAlex
- W2096528248
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 35.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ReCALL (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- learner autonomy, computer-assisted language learning, cultural-historical activity theory, activity theory, contradiction, French language learning, first-year students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0958344004000928
- The paper
- BLIN, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344004000928