Cited by 143EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningInnovative Education and Learning PracticesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective

BLIN, FRANÇOISE·2004·ReCALL

Abstract

While the concepts and principles associated with learner autonomy underpin a broad range of CALL applications and research projects, current debates and research paradigms in CALL do not provide adequate tools and models to investigate in depth the relationship between CALL and the development of learner autonomy. This paper explores the potential of cultural-historical activity theory to study this relationship. Starting from the complex and multidimensional nature of learner autonomy, it highlights some of the weaknesses in the CALL literature addressing some aspects of this relationship. Following a presentation of the main tenets of cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT), including the notion of contradiction which is at the core of CHAT, it then seeks to demonstrate how activity theory can assist us in rethinking our understanding of learner autonomy in the context of technology-rich language learning environments and in formulating suitable criteria and questions, which can guide judgemental and empirical analyses. The paper concludes by illustrating some of the principles explored through examples drawn from an activity-theoretical judgemental analysis of a French module delivered to first year students in Dublin City University.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0958344004000928

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 143

Metadata

Authors
BLIN, F.
Affiliations
Dublin City University (IE)
Corresponding author
BLIN, FRANÇOISE
Venue
ReCALL
Published
2004-11
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
377-395
ISSN
  • 0958-3440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0109
OpenAlex
W2096528248
Cited by
143
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
35.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ReCALL (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
learner autonomy, computer-assisted language learning, cultural-historical activity theory, activity theory, contradiction, French language learning, first-year students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0958344004000928
The paper
BLIN, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344004000928