Cited by 61Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Is the decline of Burrowing Owls Speotyto cunicularia in prairie Canada linked to changes in Great Plains ecosystems?

Open access
Clayton, Kort M., Schmutz, Josef K.·1999·Bird Conservation International

Abstract

Summary: We examined population and ecosystem patterns hoping to inform conservation strategies for Burrowing Owls Speotyto cunicularia in Canada. The owls chose moderately to heavily grazed grasslands for nesting and roosting, and avoided cultivated fields. Where grassland patches were isolated in 90% cultivation, owls dispersed later, for shorter distances and less often. Mortality rate during the 5-month study was high (adult ratio 0.45, juveniles 0.55), which may contribute to local declines. Additional mortality may occur on migration and during winter. We extrapolate from local effects (loss of grassland habitat with burrows for roosting, and ~2% “incidental” predation) to suggest that such changes detrimental to the owls occur throughout the central Great Plains ecosystem which the owls occupy year-round. The changes include ecosystem processes such as plant succession, owl dispersal and predation. These changes are likely to be irreversible on a scale that would be required to help this owl. The species may face extinction in Canada, at the northern limit of its range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959270900002288

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current state of cultivation technology has only justified average annual productivity up to about 13 g m−2 d−1, half that required for biomass cost targets.

    “However, the current state of cultivation technology has only justified average annual productivity up to about 13 g m -2 d -1 , half that required for biomass cost targets [17].”

    From Microalgae to biofuels through hydrothermal liquefaction: Open-source techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Habitat assessment and A demographic model passages concern Burrowing Owl habitat and population change, not biomass cultivation technology. Searches for the claimed 13 g m−2 d−1 productivity figure and biomass cost targets found no passage addressing either point. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Allen, T. F. H. and Starr, T. B. (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Anonymous. (1988) Prairie conservation action plan (map). Toronto: World Wildlife Fund Canada. Anonymous. (1993) 1992 Annual meeting. /. Raptor Res. 27: 51-52.
  2. Bloom, P. H. (1987) Capturing and handling raptors. Pp. 99-123 in B. A. G. Pendleton, B. A. Millsap, K. W. Cline and D. M. Bird, eds. Raptor management techniques manual Baltimore: National Wildlife Federation.
  3. Caughley, G. (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Toronto: Wiley.
  4. Clayton, K. M. (1997) Post-fledging ecology of Burrowing Owls in Alberta and Saskatchewan: their dispersal, survival, habitat use and diet. Saskatoon, Canada: M.Sc. thesis, University of Saskatchewan.
  5. Friedman, J. M., Scott, M. L. and Auble, G. T. (1997) Water Management and cottonwood forest dynamics along prairie streams. Pp. 49-71 in F.L. Knopf and F.B. Samson, eds. Ecology and conservation of Great Plains vertebrates, New York: Springer-Verlag.
  6. Gordon, A. (1978) Roads to Rose Lynn: A history of the Rose Lynn, Halladay, Sheerness, Stan- more, Scotfield, Richdale and Berry Creek areas. Edmonton, Canada: Inter-Collegiate Press.
  7. Hartnett, D. C, Steuter, A. A. and Hickman, K. R. (1997) Comparative ecology of native and introduced ungulates. Pp. 72-101 in F. L. Knopf and F. B. Samson, eds. Ecology and conservation of Great Plains vertebrates. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  8. Johns, D. and Soule, M. (1995) Getting from here to there: an outline of the wildlands reserve design process. Wild Earth 5(4): 32-36.
  9. Kenward, R. E. (1987) Wildlife radio-tagging. San Diego: Academic Press.
  10. King, R. A. (1996) Post-fledging dispersal and behavioural ecology of Burrowing Owls in southwestern Idaho. Boise, U.S.A.: M.S. thesis, State University.
  11. Leachman, B. (1994) Conservation of prairie dog ecosystems in the United States of Amer- ica. Soc. Conserv. Biol. Newsletter 1(2): 7.
  12. Merchant, C. (1992) Radical ecology: the search for a livable World. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
  13. Orr, D. W. (1992) Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern World. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  14. Page, J. (1997) Ranchers form a 'radical center' to protect wide-open spaces. Smithsonian 28(3): 50-56, 58 and 60-61.
  15. Rowe, J. S. (1997) The necessity of protecting ecoscapes. Global Biodivers. 7(2): 9-12.
  16. Schmutz, J. K. (1994) Endangered prairie birds and the range cow: opportunities for cooperation. Pp. 270-276 in F. K. Taha, Z. Abouguendia and P. R. Horton, eds. Managing Canadian rangelands for sustainability and profitability. Regina, Canada: Grazing and Pas- ture Technology Program.
  17. Schmutz, J. K. (1997b) Evolving attitudes and approaches in conservation biology. Pp. 103-107 in P. Jonker, J. Vandall, L. Baschak and D. Gauthier, eds. Caring for Home Place: protected areas and landscape ecology. Saskatoon: University Extension Press.
  18. White, G. C. and Garrott, R. A. (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. San Diego: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clayton, K. M., & Schmutz, J. K.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Venue
Bird Conservation International
Published
1999-06
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
163-185
ISSN
  • 0959-2709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0001
OpenAlex
W2117354760
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bird Conservation International (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Wildlife Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
Athene cunicularia, population decline (ecology), Great Plains, grassland habitat loss, grazing, habitat fragmentation, mortality, predation, vegetation succession, conservation, extinction risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review