The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Palaeolithic Populations and Waves of Advance
Abstract
The wave-of-advance model has been previously applied to Neolithic human range expansions, yielding good agreement to the speeds inferred from archaeological data. Here, we apply it for the first time to Palaeolithic human expansions by using reproduction and mobility parameters appropriate to hunter-gatherers (instead of the corresponding values for preindustrial farmers). The order of magnitude of the predicted speed is in agreement with that implied by the AMS radiocarbon dating of the lateglacial human recolonization of northern Europe (14.2–12.5 kyr bp). We argue that this makes it implausible for climate change to have limited the speed of the recolonization front. It is pointed out that a similar value for the speed can be tentatively inferred from the archaeological data on the expansion of modern humans into the Levant and Europe (42–36 kyr bp).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recolonization speed estimates for late glacial hunter-gatherers of northern Europe occurred at rates of 0.7 to 1.4 km/yr.
“Recolonization speed estimates for late glacial hunter-gatherers of northern Europe, deduced from reproduction and mobility parameters, occurred at rates of 0.7 to 1.4 km/yr43.”
From Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma (2022) · cites this paper as [43]
Estimates for more recent palaeolithic hominins range from 1 to 10 km/yr.
“Estimates are available for more recent palaeolithic hominins, ranging from 1 to 10 km/yr43–45.”
From Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma (2022) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
Cites
Population kinetics in the Upper Palaeolithic in Western Europe
Bocquet-Appel, J.-P., & Demars, P.-Y. (2000) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0471 · Cited by 126
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fate of Mutations Surfing on the Wave of a Range Expansion
Klopfstein, S., Currat, M., & Excoffier, L. (2006) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msj057 · Cited by 641
Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma
Husson, L., Salles, T., Lebatard, A.-E., Zerathe, S., Braucher, R., Noerwidi, S., Aribowo, S., Mallard, C., Carcaillet, J., Natawidjaja, D. H., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23206-9 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Fort, J., Pujol, T., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L.
- Venue
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-61
- ISSN
- 0959-7743
- 1474-0540
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
