The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves
Abstract
We consider the efficient evaluation of accurate radiation boundary conditions for time domain simulations of wave propagation on unbounded spatial domains. This issue has long been a primary stumbling block for the reliable solution of this important class of problems. In recent years, a number of new approaches have been introduced which have radically changed the situation. These include methods for the fast evaluation of the exact nonlocal operators in special geometries, novel sponge layers with reflectionless interfaces, and improved techniques for applying sequences of approximate conditions to higher order. For the primary isotropic, constant coefficient equations of wave theory, these new developments provide an essentially complete solution of the numerical radiation condition problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiation boundary conditions for wave‐like equations
Bayliss, A., & Turkel, E. (1980) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.3160330603 · Cited by 1,026
Cited by
Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation
Colonius, T., & Lele, S. K. (2004) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.09.001 · Cited by 549
High-order local non-reflecting boundary conditions: a review
Givoli, D. (2004) · Wave Motion · doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2003.12.004 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagstrom, T.
- Venue
- Acta Numerica
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 47-106
- ISSN
- 0962-4929 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0508
- OpenAlex
- W2022171568
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0962492900002890
- The paper
- Hagstrom, T. (1999). Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Acta Numerica. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962492900002890
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
