Cited by 26Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipPsychiatric care and mental health services

Clinicians’ attitudes to spirituality in old age psychiatry

Open access
Lawrence, Robert M., Head, Julia, Christodoulou, Georgina, Andonovska, Biljana, Karamat, Samina, Duggal, Anita, Hillam, Jonathan, Eagger, Sarah·2007·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this survey is to investigate professional attitudes to the presence and value of spiritual care from Old Age Psychiatrists. METHOD: All registered members of the Faculty of the Psychiatry of Old Age in the United Kingdom were asked to complete a 21-question semi-structured questionnaire. The first mail shot took place in 2002 and the second mail shot to non-respondents in 2003. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were carried out on the answers received. RESULTS: The response rate was 46%. The majority of respondents (92%) recognize the importance of spiritual dimensions of care for older people with mental health needs and about a quarter of respondents appear to consider referring patients to the chaplaincy service. In contrast, integration of spiritual advisors within the assessment and management of individual cases is rare. CONCLUSIONS: Opinions vary as to whether provision of spiritual care should become widely available to older people with mental health needs who are admitted to hospital. Old age psychiatrists recognize that awareness of spiritual dimensions may be important for their patients. They seem less clear about the role of spiritual advisors and how NHS multidisciplinary clinical teams and spiritual and pastoral care services can be best integrated. Much work needs to be done on developing effective training and operational policies in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610206004339

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 26

Authors
Lawrence, R. M., Head, J., Christodoulou, G., Andonovska, B., Karamat, S., Duggal, A., Hillam, J., & Eagger, S.
Affiliations
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Maudsley Hospital (GB)
  • University of Westminster (GB)
  • Julian Hospital (GB)
  • St Charles Hospital (GB)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
962-973
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128067615
Cited by
26
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
spiritual care, chaplaincy, psychiatric inpatients, multidisciplinary team
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Chaplaincy Service, Hospital, Data Collection, Geriatric Psychiatry, United Kingdom, Humans, Pastoral Care, Postal Service, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Religion and Medicine, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review